Hi Harbs,
Are you saying that without this namespace following situation didn't work?
.myCss {
}
.myCss .newCss {
}
Thanks,
Piotr
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018, 10:27 Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it could work on Express, even better, but my impression was that the
> structure was going to have to change pretty significantly in some cases to
> get the theming to work.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Feb 11, 2018, at 11:23 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think CSS vars would be a good addition although IE still doesn't
> handle
> > it.
> >
> > But in the other hand the Alex proposal seems to fit perfectly with what
> I
> > want to do.
> >
> > I didn't know that we have "-theme=" compiler option, and I think I will
> > use that extensively
> >
> > My last thought about all of this is if I should make this work on
> Express
> > instead of creating a complete new UI set (Vivid)
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-02-11 9:53 GMT+01:00 Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I don’t remember the details, but I’ve had css which would not compile
> >> until I specified the html namespace. It might have been using descender
> >> selectors. Not sure.
> >>
> >> Harbs
> >>
> >>> On Feb 11, 2018, at 9:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm not clear how namespace would help.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
