IMO, everything in the Flex wiki about FlexJS will be revisited and
relevant pieces copied or re-written and end up in a Royale repo wiki or
royale-docs.
Each major Royale repo should have its own wiki.  The wiki should contain
documentation for folks contributing to the code in that repo via being a
committer or sending in patches and pull requests.  The royale-asjs wiki
will also contain general useful information for contributing to the
project in general, such as making releases, reports to the board, etc.

Royale-docs should be the official "book" about Royale.

So, if its for "users" it goes into royale-docs and is more carefully
curated/edited.  If is about contributing code to Royale it goes in the
relevant repo and I personally don't care too much about how well-written,
consistent, and approachable it is.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 2/18/18, 6:52 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi:
>
>There is user discussion about dealing with circular dependencies when
>migrating Flex apps to Royale. There is good material about what this is
>and how to deal with it on the wiki [1]. Do I migrate that text into the
>help documentation or provide a link to it from the page that talks about
>app migration?
>
>The larger question is: what is the long-term status of the wiki? Do we
>harvest material out of it, or continue to build it and encourage people
>to
>contribute to it? At the moment it feels a little unreliable because most
>of the relevant references are to FlexJS, and the page I am looking at is
>stuck down a branch marked as "legacy".
>
>As a reader advocate, I would prefer this important stuff be where the
>reader can easily find it. However, if it stays where it is, 90% of the
>pages still need to be updated to address Royale realities, even if that
>only involves rebranding.
>
>Which way forward?
>
>a
>
>[1] 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apa
>che.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FCircular%2BDependencies&data=02%7C
>01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C164e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b344
>38794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636545623522166735&sdata=seoIZmgqYk%2BzvqkuC
>5yAceOOg9iEAvw4FLAO92XFY18%3D&reserved=0
>
>-- 
>Andrew Wetmore
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.
>blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C164e9e229c53494c17fc08
>d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636545623522166735
>&sdata=H4%2BYNLXDFeAURNKZmlOVRev9Uz706IlOLVQ5hCdP5lw%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
>
>
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avas
>t.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%
>3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C16
>4e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>7C636545623522166735&sdata=OLYOXKdoCnxRvnBiYAw1Vo6pKqRXmTx6FnE0Oc1ormk%3D&
>reserved=0>
>Virus-free.
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.avast.com&data=02%7
>C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C164e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
>438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636545623522166735&sdata=5qg62EPvweSYhwkFPH
>mzTIcD1Ge9uqSbEWUjq%2B81gEs%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avas
>t.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%
>3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C16
>4e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>7C636545623522166735&sdata=OLYOXKdoCnxRvnBiYAw1Vo6pKqRXmTx6FnE0Oc1ormk%3D&
>reserved=0>
><#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Reply via email to