=So, if its for "users" it goes into royale-docs and is more carefully
=curated/edited.  If is about contributing code to Royale it goes in the
=relevant repo and I personally don't care too much about how well-written,
=consistent, and approachable it is.

That is very helpful. I will proceed to migrate and upgrade (with
everyone's help) material in the wiki that will be helpful to those who
plan to use Royale for building things.

a

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
wrote:

> IMO, everything in the Flex wiki about FlexJS will be revisited and
> relevant pieces copied or re-written and end up in a Royale repo wiki or
> royale-docs.
> Each major Royale repo should have its own wiki.  The wiki should contain
> documentation for folks contributing to the code in that repo via being a
> committer or sending in patches and pull requests.  The royale-asjs wiki
> will also contain general useful information for contributing to the
> project in general, such as making releases, reports to the board, etc.
>
> Royale-docs should be the official "book" about Royale.
>
> So, if its for "users" it goes into royale-docs and is more carefully
> curated/edited.  If is about contributing code to Royale it goes in the
> relevant repo and I personally don't care too much about how well-written,
> consistent, and approachable it is.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 2/18/18, 6:52 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Hi:
> >
> >There is user discussion about dealing with circular dependencies when
> >migrating Flex apps to Royale. There is good material about what this is
> >and how to deal with it on the wiki [1]. Do I migrate that text into the
> >help documentation or provide a link to it from the page that talks about
> >app migration?
> >
> >The larger question is: what is the long-term status of the wiki? Do we
> >harvest material out of it, or continue to build it and encourage people
> >to
> >contribute to it? At the moment it feels a little unreliable because most
> >of the relevant references are to FlexJS, and the page I am looking at is
> >stuck down a branch marked as "legacy".
> >
> >As a reader advocate, I would prefer this important stuff be where the
> >reader can easily find it. However, if it stays where it is, 90% of the
> >pages still need to be updated to address Royale realities, even if that
> >only involves rebranding.
> >
> >Which way forward?
> >
> >a
> >
> >[1]
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apa
> >che.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FCircular%
> 2BDependencies&data=02%7C
> >01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C164e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df
> 3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b344
> >38794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636545623522166735&sdata=
> seoIZmgqYk%2BzvqkuC
> >5yAceOOg9iEAvw4FLAO92XFY18%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >--
> >Andrew Wetmore
> >
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14
> .
> >blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C164e9e229c53494c17fc08
> >d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636545623522166735
> >&sdata=H4%2BYNLXDFeAURNKZmlOVRev9Uz706IlOLVQ5hCdP5lw%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avas
> >t.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%
> 3Dlink%26utm_campaign%
> >3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C16
> >4e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%
> >7C636545623522166735&sdata=OLYOXKdoCnxRvnBiYAw1Vo6pKqRXmT
> x6FnE0Oc1ormk%3D&
> >reserved=0>
> >Virus-free.
> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.avast.com&data=02%7
> >C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C164e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df
> 3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34
> >438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636545623522166735&sdata=
> 5qg62EPvweSYhwkFPH
> >mzTIcD1Ge9uqSbEWUjq%2B81gEs%3D&reserved=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avas
> >t.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%
> 3Dlink%26utm_campaign%
> >3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C16
> >4e9e229c53494c17fc08d576df3c2c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%
> >7C636545623522166735&sdata=OLYOXKdoCnxRvnBiYAw1Vo6pKqRXmT
> x6FnE0Oc1ormk%3D&
> >reserved=0>
> ><#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to