Hi Alex, I finaly could build MXRoyale with maven and:
1.- HelloWorld; I can see the label "Hello World" but only on js-release, not in js-debug. So I think that's weird, did you saw that issue? 2.- ControlsExample: compile but I see the same as in 1) nothing in debug and HelloWorld label in release. I suppose that's normal since I remember you want to make all compile, but still don't have visuals. That's right? thanks 2018-04-26 19:21 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > Hi Alex, > > you're right, our case (Codeoscopic Application to migrate) uses modules > extensively too, so Modules is for me very needed, and will be for any > serious royale application out there. > I want to have SWF side as well, and I'll try it as I get some time. As > you say, we should: > > 1.- get at least bounding boxes and event handlers working so we could see > a "ugly" interface that layouts correctly and work correctly, but doesn't > look pretty at that time > > 2.- make it match HTML look and feel > > For me 1 is important, and we can delay 2 for now, since we need to get > more a more needed components on Jewel. > > In the other hand, I can at some time, help on making MXRoyale look like > MX and Spark...but I think there's much to do now to think on that, and I > don't mind if that components doesn't look good right now. I think MX and > Spark need work flawlessly for now and have at least bounding boxes on > screen and events working. > > Thanks > > Carlos > > > > 2018-04-25 18:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while >> longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF output as >> well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the Flash >> version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings. Eventually, I hope >> that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel >> views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look great, it >> just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to make >> sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier. >> >> If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be >> interesting to see. >> >> I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these components is >> going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts >> >> My 2 cents, >> -Alex >> >> On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos >> Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> 2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: >> >> > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all. >> There are >> > examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark. >> > >> >> That sounds very good. Congrats! >> >> >> > >> > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. The >> first six >> > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that tested >> internals >> > were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work because to >> get that >> > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some >> containers as >> > well. >> > >> > But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and I have >> been >> > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much time on >> this as >> > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help. >> Getting all >> > of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to run is >> going to >> > be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark working >> in this >> > short amount of time is not realistic. >> > >> >> Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on board >> showing >> Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I had a >> long >> journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can blog, >> twit and >> so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key factor. >> >> Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social >> networks. I >> tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. I'll do >> it >> today in order to see it working. >> >> If we can show that work, and make people out there know about it, >> maybe we >> can bring you more people to help in that effort. >> >> Thanks >> >> Carlos >> >> >> > >> > My 2 cents, >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos >> > Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation >> components to >> > show >> > the work done >> > Something that aggregates all mx and spark components that we >> have now >> > emulated? >> > I'm interested in watch what we have actually. >> > >> > thanks! >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Rovira >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%4 >> 0adobe.com% >> > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2% >> > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0 >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A% >> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe. >> com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a >> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghX >> prH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
