So you mean that ControlsExample are looking wrong and components should appear? Strange...
Ok, hope someone could take a look, since I think it could be another good point to make noise in social networks...a good one :) thanks 2018-05-03 20:24 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > Hi Carlos, > > I haven't looked at those examples in a long time. My main focus is on > getting the Flex SDK Mustella tests to run. I've got plenty on my plate > right now so it would be good for others to figure out why things are going > wrong and get to know the emulation components better. > > My 2 cents, > -Alex > > On 5/3/18, 9:29 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > I finaly could build MXRoyale with maven and: > > 1.- HelloWorld; I can see the label "Hello World" but only on > js-release, > not in js-debug. So I think that's weird, did you saw that issue? > > 2.- ControlsExample: compile but I see the same as in 1) nothing in > debug > and HelloWorld label in release. I suppose that's normal since I > remember > you want to make all compile, but still don't have visuals. That's > right? > > thanks > > 2018-04-26 19:21 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > you're right, our case (Codeoscopic Application to migrate) uses > modules > > extensively too, so Modules is for me very needed, and will be for > any > > serious royale application out there. > > I want to have SWF side as well, and I'll try it as I get some time. > As > > you say, we should: > > > > 1.- get at least bounding boxes and event handlers working so we > could see > > a "ugly" interface that layouts correctly and work correctly, but > doesn't > > look pretty at that time > > > > 2.- make it match HTML look and feel > > > > For me 1 is important, and we can delay 2 for now, since we need to > get > > more a more needed components on Jewel. > > > > In the other hand, I can at some time, help on making MXRoyale look > like > > MX and Spark...but I think there's much to do now to think on that, > and I > > don't mind if that components doesn't look good right now. I think > MX and > > Spark need work flawlessly for now and have at least bounding boxes > on > > screen and events working. > > > > Thanks > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > 2018-04-25 18:36 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi Carlos, > >> > >> I think these components are going to look ugly for a little while > >> longer. Also, I have been trying to get them to work for SWF > output as > >> well because Alina's app uses modules extensively and having the > Flash > >> version verify interfaces could be a huge time savings. > Eventually, I hope > >> that we can replace the views in the emulation components with Jewel > >> views. The SWF version of the Jewel views don't have to look > great, it > >> just has to take up the same space on the screen. We just want to > make > >> sure we can run most of the code paths through the verifier. > >> > >> If you have time to try mocking the visuals for SWF that would be > >> interesting to see. > >> > >> I'm mainly saying that I don't think blog posts about these > components is > >> going to look nearly as attractive as the Jewel blog posts > >> > >> My 2 cents, > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 4/25/18, 1:32 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos > >> Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Alex, > >> > >> 2018-04-25 9:39 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[email protected] > >: > >> > >> > 120 MX classes compile. Only six MX UI components work at all. > >> There are > >> > examples in examples/mxroyale. We have not started on Spark. > >> > > >> > >> That sounds very good. Congrats! > >> > >> > >> > > >> > In mustella/mxtests is a copy of the flex-sdk checkintest. > The > >> first six > >> > tests run without modification (actually a few tests that > tested > >> internals > >> > were disabled). That's actually a fair amount of work > because to > >> get that > >> > much to run we had to emulate Application and states and some > >> containers as > >> > well. > >> > > >> > But like I said in another thread. This is a new effort and > I have > >> been > >> > distracted by other things and haven't spent nearly as much > time on > >> this as > >> > I had hoped, and wished more existing committers would help. > >> Getting all > >> > of this to compile is a fair amount of work. Getting it to > run is > >> going to > >> > be a serious effort. Expecting that we'd get MX and Spark > working > >> in this > >> > short amount of time is not realistic. > >> > > >> > >> Alex, I think is not realistic to think we can get people on > board > >> showing > >> Basic examples, or thinks that "doesn't look good". For me, I > had a > >> long > >> journey to start producing things that looks in a way we can > blog, > >> twit and > >> so on..., so what you see wasn't worth it, for me is the key > factor. > >> > >> Now I can start to spread the word about this effort in social > >> networks. I > >> tried the examples, but need to fix poms to build with maven. > I'll do > >> it > >> today in order to see it working. > >> > >> If we can show that work, and make people out there know about > it, > >> maybe we > >> can bring you more people to help in that effort. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Carlos > >> > >> > >> > > >> > My 2 cents, > >> > -Alex > >> > > >> > On 4/24/18, 3:40 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of > Carlos > >> > Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of > >> [email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > I was wondering if there's some example of the emulation > >> components to > >> > show > >> > the work done > >> > Something that aggregates all mx and spark components > that we > >> have now > >> > emulated? > >> > I'm interested in watch what we have actually. > >> > > >> > thanks! > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Carlos Rovira > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%4 > >> 0adobe.com% > >> > 7Cc891b5522835498199f008d5aa345bd8% > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > >> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602064300395249&sdata=M%2BTgzk0xPfCEFDikU2% > >> > 2B1QFINpCpLImtJu4qHbjm6da4%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A% > >> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe. > >> com%7C052d802e5387439f45f308d5aa871bc1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a > >> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602419622998891&sdata=1BL0npo7ghX > >> prH5aP17Ftt%2BzryTKk9r56uyjdGePObg%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C3e0cb38956b7443fcd2208d5b11303b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636609617583309135&sdata=YexFWa5Uzk6cggwR8oqI6MmG2mcrJD > Dg1egju7GbIVc%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com% > 7C3e0cb38956b7443fcd2208d5b11303b7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636609617583309135&sdata=YexFWa5Uzk6cggwR8oqI6MmG2mcrJD > Dg1egju7GbIVc%3D&reserved=0 > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
