Hi Harbs 2018-07-06 10:27 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[email protected]>:
> Here’s what I’d like to do so we could just get out a release: > > * Postpone any final decision on package and project refactoring until > after the release. > Ok for me, although I think this was one of the things we all agree. But I think you refer that is better to make refactors after 0.9.3 what I think is a good idea. > * Make sure (for the current release only) that the package names match > the previous release (even if they could use changing). > the list fo changed package names I posted was not final, so this packages can be reverted. The only problem I see is that is a work to give an step backwards instead to go forward. That could be done, but just seems to me we're giving that part a level of importance that does not match a 0.9.x release. If this kind of things was done after 1.x, this would be clear to change it and do it ASAP, but don't you think we can save time and resources and left this for 0.9.4 with more refactors we already planned? -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
