I’m running ant all from royale-asjs. I’m not sure when I’m going to have the time to work on this, but I’ll look into it more when I do…
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 10:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > If you don't get errors in the output for compiling the Date tests without > the Flash variables, that implies that an older compiler is running. The > latest should be picking up the field-readonly and result in those compile > errors in the console output, but since the compile errors are expected that > should not result in a failure. The failure might be something else like > some sensitivity to your time zone. So check the junit-reports file and see > what it says failed if you can reproduce it. > > Same for typedefs. It seems like you aren't running the latest compiler. > Are you just running "ant" from royale-typedefs? Maybe it is picking up the > jars from royale-asjs that haven't been updated yet. You can add some <echo> > statements to the js/build.xml and see what ROYALE_TRANSPILER_HOME is > calculated to be. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 7/25/18, 11:12 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Jul 26, 2018, at 2:55 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> I took a closer look. If you are getting ASDateTest failures, you will need >> to open compiler/target/junit-reports/TEST-as.ASDateTests.xml and see what >> the failure is. The compile errors in the output are expected and should >> not cause test failures. > > I’ll try to look at this again. I was only getting the errors when I > compile with the Flash environment variables. > >> If you are having a problem with field-readonly, it implies that the >> compiler you are using is stale. >> compiler-externc/src/main/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/clients/ExternCConfiguration.java >> should contain an entry for field-readonly. > > My source does contain the entry. That’s what’s really weird. I confirmed > that externs was wiped and regenerated when I compile. Is there some file I > might be missing? > >> >> HTH, >> -Alex >> >> On 7/25/18, 12:52 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I rolled back royale-typedefs to before the Date changes to enable my >> compilation. It does seem to me like we need to figure this out though… >> >> Harbs >> >>> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I tried without environment vars and that might have made a difference. I’ >>> using these normally: >>> >>> export ROYALE_COMPILER_REPO=/Apache/royale-compiler >>> export AIR_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/AIRSDK_Compiler >>> export PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/libs/player >>> export FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER=/Apache/frameworks/Flash\ Player\ >>> Debugger.app/Contents/MacOS/Flash\ Player\ Debugger >>> export ROYALE_HOME=/Apache/royale-asjs >>> >>> I’m now getting field-readonly error again… :-( >>> >>>> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Weird. I ran ant all again and it’s no longer getting this error, but it’s >>>> failing again on the Date tests (4 failures). >>>> >>>>> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com >>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes I did, but it looks like that does not clear the files in the >>>>> typedefs repo. >>>>> >>>>> I just manually deleted all the target folders in typedefs and now I’m >>>>> getting a new error: >>>>> >>>>> externc: >>>>> [java] Unknown tag:field-readonly >>>>> [java] 0.362347459 seconds >>>>> [java] >>>>> org.apache.royale.compiler.exceptions.ConfigurationException.UnknownVariable[var='field-readonly', >>>>> line='178', >>>>> source='/Apache/royale-typedefs/js/src/main/config/externc-config.xml']. >>>>> [java] /Apache/royale-typedefs/js/src/main/config/externc-config.xml >>>>> (line: 178) >>>>> >>>>> Where is field-readonly supposed to be defined? >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >>>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you run "ant wipe-all" in royale-compiler? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/24/18, 10:47 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m currently getting the following errors: >>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It looks like the Date tests are causing problems. Any ideas why? >>>>>> >>>>>> Harbs >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
