FWIW, I ran into the same or similar problem today. For me, quotes around the
entry in env.properties:
FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER='/Users/aharui/adobe/flashplayer/11.1/Flash Player
Debugger.app/Contents/MacOS/Flash Player Debugger'
Resulted in the FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER not being found and the tests going into
"no-Flash" test running even though they'd been compiled with Flash
playerglobal.swc". Removing the quotes resulted in the test runner finding
FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER and the tests passed again.
The output went from having quotes to not having quotes as in:
environment property - FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER =
/Users/aharui/adobe/flashplayer/11.1/Flash Player
Debugger.app/Contents/MacOS/Flash Player Debugger
HTH,
-Alex
On 7/26/18, 9:15 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
In general, if "ant all" fails in the compiler, try running "ant" directly
in royale-compiler. Same for royale-typedefs.
HTH,
-Alex
On 7/26/18, 2:00 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
I’m running ant all from royale-asjs.
I’m not sure when I’m going to have the time to work on this, but I’ll
look into it more when I do…
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 10:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
wrote:
>
> If you don't get errors in the output for compiling the Date tests
without the Flash variables, that implies that an older compiler is running.
The latest should be picking up the field-readonly and result in those compile
errors in the console output, but since the compile errors are expected that
should not result in a failure. The failure might be something else like some
sensitivity to your time zone. So check the junit-reports file and see what it
says failed if you can reproduce it.
>
> Same for typedefs. It seems like you aren't running the latest
compiler. Are you just running "ant" from royale-typedefs? Maybe it is
picking up the jars from royale-asjs that haven't been updated yet. You can
add some <echo> statements to the js/build.xml and see what
ROYALE_TRANSPILER_HOME is calculated to be.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 7/25/18, 11:12 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 26, 2018, at 2:55 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
wrote:
>>
>> I took a closer look. If you are getting ASDateTest failures, you
will need to open compiler/target/junit-reports/TEST-as.ASDateTests.xml and see
what the failure is. The compile errors in the output are expected and should
not cause test failures.
>
> I’ll try to look at this again. I was only getting the errors when
I compile with the Flash environment variables.
>
>> If you are having a problem with field-readonly, it implies that the
compiler you are using is stale.
compiler-externc/src/main/java/org/apache/royale/compiler/clients/ExternCConfiguration.java
should contain an entry for field-readonly.
>
> My source does contain the entry. That’s what’s really weird. I
confirmed that externs was wiped and regenerated when I compile. Is there some
file I might be missing?
>
>>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 7/25/18, 12:52 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I rolled back royale-typedefs to before the Date changes to enable
my compilation. It does seem to me like we need to figure this out though…
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried without environment vars and that might have made a
difference. I’ using these normally:
>>>
>>> export ROYALE_COMPILER_REPO=/Apache/royale-compiler
>>> export AIR_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/AIRSDK_Compiler
>>> export PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Apache/frameworks/libs/player
>>> export FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER=/Apache/frameworks/Flash\ Player\
Debugger.app/Contents/MacOS/Flash\ Player\ Debugger
>>> export ROYALE_HOME=/Apache/royale-asjs
>>>
>>> I’m now getting field-readonly error again… :-(
>>>
>>>> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Weird. I ran ant all again and it’s no longer getting this error,
but it’s failing again on the Date tests (4 failures).
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 25, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes I did, but it looks like that does not clear the files in the
typedefs repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just manually deleted all the target folders in typedefs and
now I’m getting a new error:
>>>>>
>>>>> externc:
>>>>> [java] Unknown tag:field-readonly
>>>>> [java] 0.362347459 seconds
>>>>> [java]
org.apache.royale.compiler.exceptions.ConfigurationException.UnknownVariable[var='field-readonly',
line='178',
source='/Apache/royale-typedefs/js/src/main/config/externc-config.xml'].
>>>>> [java]
/Apache/royale-typedefs/js/src/main/config/externc-config.xml (line: 178)
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is field-readonly supposed to be defined?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Alex Harui
<aha...@adobe.com.INVALID <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you run "ant wipe-all" in royale-compiler?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/24/18, 10:47 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m currently getting the following errors:
>>>>>>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0>
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F3Wpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cae7cd23df8204531b26108d5f18d8d46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636680512616417047&sdata=SjmjSTlfL3tBEAHR7o%2FEx4akD7LhTx0QQqk3w1Bkt%2F0%3D&reserved=0>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like the Date tests are causing problems. Any ideas why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
