Hi Carlos, As I understand you are using JS in connection with appropriate config. However why are you trying to use JS config to build Jewel stuff? JS is suppose to be used for pure JS projects as far as I understand.
Thanks, Piotr On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 3:53 PM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi I tried JS instead of JSRoyale but I think I have something wrong > configured in Jewel, JewelTheme and JewelExample. > Josh, could you check this project configurations and suggest what could be > the best config for those? If you can, that would be something like a > "template" to use. In the meanwhile, I'll continue building with Maven. > thanks in advance > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:52, Josh Tynjala (<[email protected] > >) > escribió: > > > Yeah, it makes sense to use JSRoyale with js-config.xml to exclude parts > > of the framework referenced in royale-config.xml. Unexpected changes to > > js-config.xml in the future could possibly cause some surprises, but if > > that's probably not a huge risk. This would be a decent exception to the > > rule. > > > > - Josh > > > > On 2018/09/11 17:47:41, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > FWIW, I think the framework swcs are built using the config Piotr is > > using since want JSRoyale output, but we don't want to assume SWC > > dependencies specified in royale-config (because we are building the SWCs > > in those dependencies). > > > > > > However, you are correct for most SWCs that application developers will > > be building. > > > > > > Of course, I could be wrong... > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 9/11/18, 10:21 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey Piotr, > > > > > > There's something a little strange in your compiler options that > you > > should probably fix: > > > > > > You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but these > two > > aren't necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler > > options: > > > > > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale > > > -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml > > > > > > However, it should either be this: > > > > > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale > > > -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml > > > > > > or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or pure > > JS): > > > > > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JS > > > -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml > > > > > > Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use JS > > with js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar > > output, but it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in all > > cases. > > > > > > (As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the JSNode > > target that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also produces > > different output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for > Node.js) > > > > > > One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to build a > > SWC, you'll need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, > that > > was throwing an exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did not. > I > > suspect that this may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, but > now > > JS should work too! > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some > > project. I > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can try > > it > > > > yourself). > > > > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project with > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that SWC > > I'm not > > > > able to build project with it. [1] > > > > > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations > > compile-swf-config.xml > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF > version. > > > > > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with > Moonshine > > and > > > > VSCode. > > > > > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following command > > lines [4] > > > > > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command lines > > [4] are > > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtvhY&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=8wNnZdcsKAwMUSPkEMln4lIYant36T0FNpCwbjhxE7w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > [2] > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=p9FuFZl3Q69unFF%2F%2BWvoiQ1%2BgFgmKK432O8yfpSxHeI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > [3] > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=j8eS3h60ZTJ%2Bdq5hmI1Fa1aLoZ6FJfYFXJzyasns054%3D&reserved=0 > > > > [4] > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOtDR&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=m7b68csRqLF0nnRHOemiNmryFekbHgUGgLFTNkSxZUQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=ua2LEaq3tv5oEmOvalMBlT4q8CPJRUysSv5Bocy39QM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > < > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=ua2LEaq3tv5oEmOvalMBlT4q8CPJRUysSv5Bocy39QM%3D&reserved=0 > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira >
