JSRoyale is connected with royale-config.xml, so you basically can have in your project some components from our framework. If you put JS you probably got fail because those components will not be recognized.
At least this is how I understand it. :) Thanks, Piotr śr., 12 wrz 2018 o 17:52 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a): > Hi, > ok maybe I didn't understand this ok. I though JSRoyale was old config and > JS was the new. So if we want a flash and HTML we must use SWF + JS, if we > want only flash use SWF and if we want html we use JS only. So if JSRoyale > and JS are different things what's targeting JSRoyale? > > thanks > > El mié., 12 sept. 2018 a las 16:41, Piotr Zarzycki (< > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > As I understand you are using JS in connection with appropriate config. > > However why are you trying to use JS config to build Jewel stuff? JS is > > suppose to be used for pure JS projects as far as I understand. > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 3:53 PM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi I tried JS instead of JSRoyale but I think I have something wrong > > > configured in Jewel, JewelTheme and JewelExample. > > > Josh, could you check this project configurations and suggest what > could > > be > > > the best config for those? If you can, that would be something like a > > > "template" to use. In the meanwhile, I'll continue building with Maven. > > > thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > El mar., 11 sept. 2018 a las 22:52, Josh Tynjala (< > > joshtynj...@apache.org > > > >) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > Yeah, it makes sense to use JSRoyale with js-config.xml to exclude > > parts > > > > of the framework referenced in royale-config.xml. Unexpected changes > to > > > > js-config.xml in the future could possibly cause some surprises, but > if > > > > that's probably not a huge risk. This would be a decent exception to > > the > > > > rule. > > > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > > > On 2018/09/11 17:47:41, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > FWIW, I think the framework swcs are built using the config Piotr > is > > > > using since want JSRoyale output, but we don't want to assume SWC > > > > dependencies specified in royale-config (because we are building the > > SWCs > > > > in those dependencies). > > > > > > > > > > However, you are correct for most SWCs that application developers > > will > > > > be building. > > > > > > > > > > Of course, I could be wrong... > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > On 9/11/18, 10:21 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hey Piotr, > > > > > > > > > > There's something a little strange in your compiler options > that > > > you > > > > should probably fix: > > > > > > > > > > You're specifying JSRoyale and js-config.xml together, but > these > > > two > > > > aren't necessarily compatible. Here's what you have in your compiler > > > > options: > > > > > > > > > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale > > > > > -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml > > > > > > > > > > However, it should either be this: > > > > > > > > > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale > > > > > > > -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\royale-config.xml > > > > > > > > > > or maybe this (depending on if you want Royale components or > pure > > > > JS): > > > > > > > > > > -compiler.targets=SWF,JS > > > > > -load-config=d:\royale_nightly_js_swf\frameworks\js-config.xml > > > > > > > > > > Basically, you use JSRoyale with royale-config.xml, or you use > JS > > > > with js-config.xml. The JSRoyale and JS targets produce very similar > > > > output, but it's best not to assume that they're exactly the same in > > all > > > > cases. > > > > > > > > > > (As a side note, it's worth mentioning that there's also the > > JSNode > > > > target that's meant to work with node-config.xml. JSNode also > produces > > > > different output than JSRoyale or JS because it generates code for > > > Node.js) > > > > > > > > > > One last thing. In order to use -compiler.targets=SWF,JS to > > build a > > > > SWC, you'll need my compiler changes from yesterday. For some reason, > > > that > > > > was throwing an exception, while -compiler.targets=SWF,JSRoyale did > > not. > > > I > > > > suspect that this may be why you were using JSRoyale instead of JS, > but > > > now > > > > JS should work too! > > > > > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > > > > > On 2018/09/11 09:45:52, Piotr Zarzycki < > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having difficulties with using created Royale SWC in some > > > > project. I > > > > > > have two projects. (I've uploaded them on onedrive so you can > > try > > > > it > > > > > > yourself). > > > > > > > > > > > > Using SWF version of prepared swc I'm able to build project > > with > > > > > > compiler.targets=SWF. Unfortunately using JS version of that > > SWC > > > > I'm not > > > > > > able to build project with it. [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Library itself [2] - It contains configurations > > > > compile-swf-config.xml > > > > > > and compile-js-config.xml. Folder "bin" has swc JS and SWF > > > version. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Consumer of library [3] - This one is configured with > > > Moonshine > > > > and > > > > > > VSCode. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm building JS and SWF version of SWC using following > command > > > > lines [4] > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone is seeing what could be wrong ? Those command > lines > > > > [4] are > > > > > > based on how Royale is building swcs Basic, Jewel etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FtvhY&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=8wNnZdcsKAwMUSPkEMln4lIYant36T0FNpCwbjhxE7w%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwM9OY5sNinrirEvQ&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=p9FuFZl3Q69unFF%2F%2BWvoiQ1%2BgFgmKK432O8yfpSxHeI%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2hZwNgXaX_G_qZip39g&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=j8eS3h60ZTJ%2Bdq5hmI1Fa1aLoZ6FJfYFXJzyasns054%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > [4] > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FOtDR&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=m7b68csRqLF0nnRHOemiNmryFekbHgUGgLFTNkSxZUQ%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=ua2LEaq3tv5oEmOvalMBlT4q8CPJRUysSv5Bocy39QM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5a8dfde09c3a43c1dc5708d6180b0bf9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636722833090144497&sdata=ua2LEaq3tv5oEmOvalMBlT4q8CPJRUysSv5Bocy39QM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
