Hi Piotr,
Well, it depends. In looking at the repos, I do not see the 0.9.4 tag, which
is strange since Carlos's Git GUI client is updating it.
IMO, for sure, you should update releasecandidate.xml per my earlier email,
delete the repos out of the folder you are using and see how far you get.
Maybe there is a bad tag I can't see that Maven will see and fail. Not sure
what to do in that case, maybe we'll have to give up on 0.9.4 as a version and
try to upgrade the version to 0.9.5. Or maybe the tag never got pushed and
deleting the repos locally will resolve the issue.
Good luck,
-Alex
On 10/11/18, 10:24 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
Alex,
In the other words If I have time today I can continue with the process? We
end up with situation where I need to remove tag and try again as I
remember?
Thanks,
Piotr
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 7:12 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> I agree with your sentiments. However, I think one problem is that the
> revert emails are misleading. Unlike other commits, the subject of a
> revert does not show what branch was changed, so I think Carlos was
> reverting things in a branch.
>
> That said, it is still very troublesome that his Git tools are changing
> the tags. IMO, Carlos will have to stop using that tool.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 10/11/18, 9:57 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Carlos,
>
> You are expecting from people who are volunteers to do some things in
> one
> day? It's impossible to do that. I'm not working on that full time. I
> did
> first finally successful step for the release. Everything was reported
> on
> this list. I had problems and didn't have time to resolve it. Alex
> provide
> solution - next RM should pickup it and continue release. It can take
> days.
> If you have problems you should create branch from the last stable
> commit.
> Is it problem for you ?
>
> How can we now get back to the previous state now?
>
> Piotr
>
> pt., 12 paź 2018 o 02:09 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Alex,
> > if you check in actual develop for "0.9.5-SNAPSHOT" and
> "0.9.4-SNAPSHOT"
> > you'll see maven build compiler and typedefs 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, but
> when build
> > framework, it downloads compiler and typedefs 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT since
> the
> > versions in framework are not updated. This is the reason you don't
> see any
> > fail when building with maven. If you update all to use the same
> number it
> > will fail. I recommend you as well to remove royale folder in your
> local
> > .m2 to see how maven generates compiler and typedefs and then
> download
> > other version.
> >
> > Maybe the rest of people didn't see this because they use ANT and
> that
> > build system is not affected by the release process. But I think we
> can't
> > left the failed release process without revert it for days, since we
> are
> > all seeing different things.
> >
> > For example, I was able to run your MX RO example with ANT, but I
> can make
> > it work with Maven, what means to me that I still can't use it since
> my
> > entire project is in maven.
> >
> > I'm trying to fix this for several hours now and still couldn't test
> mx RO
> > nor working on my project...
> >
> > I'm closing for today with all messed up. Tomorrow will try again,
> or will
> > need to block me in a branch to be able to continue working.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El vie., 12 oct. 2018 a las 1:53, Alex Harui
> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > The 0.9.4 release branch has been cut. I have not seen any
> problems
> > > reported against it, so I don't know of any reason to delete it.
> Thus,
> > the
> > > develop branch should be at 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
> > >
> > > I noticed you messed around with the versions so I have no idea
> what
> > state
> > > we are in, plus I continue to see that tags are being updated.
> You will
> > > probably have to stop using your Git GUI. We cannot have tags be
> > modified.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/11/18, 3:14 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm a bit confused with the actual state of the repo. We
> should stay
> > in
> > > 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT? or 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT?
> > > I'm building with the latest since 1-2 days but removed all
> royale
> > > folder
> > > with all maven artifacts and rebuild from scratch, makes me
> have
> > mixed
> > > versions, since some artifacts are downloading 0.9.4 instead
> of use
> > > 0.9.5
> > >
> > > Piotr, seems nobody take the request to continue with the
> release
> > for
> > > now,
> > > so I propose to stabilize the repo.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El jue., 11 oct. 2018 a las 20:33, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately in the next couple of days I won't have time
> for
> > that.
> > > If
> > > > someone can do that feel free jump into it.
> > > >
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PM Alex Harui
> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > After digging through the output you pasted, it appears
> that the
> > > > > "check-empty-folder" target isn't quite right and didn't
> catch
> > > that you
> > > > > didn't run "maven" against an empty folder. Although I am
> a bit
> > > puzzled
> > > > > why there were modified files in the working copy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven and the scripts have some expectation that you are
> starting
> > > from
> > > > the
> > > > > beginning, so if Maven got far enough to create a tag and
> you
> > have
> > > to
> > > > start
> > > > > over, you have to remove the tag. These scripts are still
> under
> > > > > development so you should not expect that every situation
> has
> > been
> > > > > accounted for.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, go delete the tag. Instructions for doing so are in
> the
> > > wiki. Maybe
> > > > > figure out why those files were modified, but maybe
> because your
> > > earlier
> > > > > run didn't have the right gpg password.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try changing the check-empty-folder to also test for:
> > > > >
> > > > > <available
> file="${basedir}/royale-asjs/build.properties"
> > > > > type="file"
> > > > > property="found.build.properties" value="true"
> />
> > > > >
> > > > > Then it should catch you on the steps where you are
> supposed to
> > > start by
> > > > > pulling down the repos again.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you don't have time for any of that, let us know here
> so the
> > > next RM
> > > > > can know where to start.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/11/18, 2:05 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I gave up again :) It costs me to much time. I thought
> since
> > > Om did
> > > > so
> > > > > much
> > > > > progress I will launch the script and will work. It's
> still
> > > failing.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FWJ44&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=LD8lMIXS1ApkRl9XtxIdl9my4qODg2%2F2CBSrMZk8Cpk%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > > > I run first time and had problem with gpg password -
> just
> > > forgot it,
> > > > > but
> > > > > run it again and type correct password. Probably first
> time
> > > this tag
> > > > > was
> > > > > created and now script failing cause tag exits. Never
> ending
> > > story.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm in that step - If someone would like to try it out
> let me
> > > know
> > > > and
> > > > > I
> > > > > won't revert anything for now:
> > > > >
> > > > > ant -f releasecandidate.xml -Drelease.version="0.9.4"
> > > > > -Dbrowser="c:\Program
> > > > > Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" -Drc=1 maven
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > czw., 11 paź 2018 o 10:13 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is what I'm getting for git status for
> royale-compiler
> > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FYuiH&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=%2BFct%2F9O427FmUha4o450SxlZ65ip5jcoCUbentrjcHY%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > śr., 10 paź 2018 o 17:50 Alex Harui
> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > > >
> > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> What does 'git status' return for that local copy
> of the
> > > > > royale-compiler
> > > > > >> repo?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> That part of the script is trying to see if
> > > compiler-jburg-types
> > > > and
> > > > > >> compiler-build-tools needed a version update that
> needs to
> > > be
> > > > > pushed.
> > > > > >> Those two projects should be at 1.0.0 since we
> rarely, if
> > > ever,
> > > > > will need
> > > > > >> to modify it. There shouldn't have been
> modifications in
> > > this
> > > > > release, yet
> > > > > >> Git status is reporting modifications to some
> file. A
> > test
> > > is
> > > > done
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> check for the word "modified:" in the 'git status'
> output,
> > > then
> > > > that
> > > > > >> attempt to push is executed. Somehow, the git
> status is
> > > implying
> > > > > >> modifications but the files we are trying to push
> are not
> > > > modified.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The solutions should not require reverting of the
> release
> > > branch.
> > > > > It
> > > > > >> looks like you have successfully created a correct
> set of
> > > branches
> > > > > and the
> > > > > >> steps you are running start by pulling down the
> release
> > > branch. I
> > > > > didn't
> > > > > >> see any commits to the release branch from the
> scripts, so
> > > to
> > > > > re-start, it
> > > > > >> should just be manually deleting the local copies
> of the
> > > repos and
> > > > > running
> > > > > >> the Ant command again after making one of the
> changes to
> > > > > >> releasecandidate.xml I will describe below:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> IMO, the choices are (and there may be more
choices)
> > > > > >> 1. Figure out how to be smarter about what 'git
> status'
> > > output
> > > > > will say
> > > > > >> so the test works correctly
> > > > > >> 2. Set failonerror="false" on the push step and not
> care
> > if
> > > that
> > > > > push
> > > > > >> succeeds. This is slightly risky if we ever do
> want to
> > push
> > > > > changes, but
> > > > > >> again, that is low probability, IMO.
> > > > > >> 3. Comment out those steps since it will be rare we
> will
> > > need
> > > > > them. If
> > > > > >> we do need them some day, the RM will have to
> remember to
> > > > uncomment
> > > > > those
> > > > > >> steps.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> HTH,
> > > > > >> -Alex
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 10/10/18, 2:52 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok It's failed :) However I passed step 3 in
> > > instruction. Step
> > > > > 4 is
> > > > > >> failing
> > > > > >> [1] - if someone know what could it be - I will
> wait
> > > with
> > > > > reverting
> > > > > >> changes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Lines in stacktrace are pointing in ant script
> to
> > > following
> > > > > targets:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Line 556: git-commit-and-push-utils
> > > > > >> Line 487: git-commit-and-push-utils-if-modified
> > > > > >> Line 473:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> <exec executable="${git}" dir="${compiler}"
> > > > failonerror="true" >
> > > > > >> <arg value="commit" />
> > > > > >> <arg value="-m" />
> > > > > >> <arg value="remove SNAPSHOT from
> > > > > compiler-jburg-types and
> > > > > >> compiler-build-tools versions" />
> > > > > >> </exec>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbg5e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=JeWQNA0OphSXXDh7EeT427LAD4vmMXFRYKCtYauNZJE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Piotr
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> śr., 10 paź 2018 o 11:34 Carlos Rovira <
> > > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> napisał(a):
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Ok Piotr, good luck! :)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 10:34, Piotr
> Zarzycki (<
> > > > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > I will try right now process from my PC. We
> will
> > > see how
> > > > > far I
> > > > > >> will go
> > > > > >> > with
> > > > > >> > > that.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Piotr
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > czw., 4 paź 2018 o 22:01 Alex Harui
> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > >> > napisał(a):
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > Hi Om,
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > If make_branches succeeds, then you
> shouldn't
> > > need to go
> > > > > back
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > >> > delete
> > > > > >> > > > branches and tags and run make_branches
> again if
> > > the
> > > > > "maven"
> > > > > >> step
> > > > > >> > fails.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > You might need to revert any changes to
> the
> > > release
> > > > > branch that
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > > "maven" step did, but then you should be
> able to
> > > delete
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> local copy
> > > > > >> > of
> > > > > >> > > > the branches and start again with "maven"
> or
> > > > > >> > > > "maven_skip_compiler_and_typedefs" if you
> got
> > all
> > > the
> > > > way
> > > > > up to
> > > > > >> > > royale-asjs.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > What are some of the 200+ files that
> don't get
> > > reverted
> > > > > back to
> > > > > >> 0.9.4?
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > You are welcome to try to add the
> "continue"
> > > option. I
> > > > > would
> > > > > >> suggest
> > > > > >> > > > adding a dummy parameter. So if the
> script
> > > currently
> > > > > calls
> > > > > >> Maven like
> > > > > >> > > this:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > <exec executable="${mvn}"
> > > > > >> dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin"
> > > > > >> > > > failonerror="true" >
> > > > > >> > > > <arg value="clean" />
> > > > > >> > > > <arg value="install" />
> > > > > >> > > > </exec>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > You can try changing it to something like
> this:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > <property name="continueOption"
> > > > value="-Ddummy=0"
> > > > > />
> > > > > >> > > > <exec executable="${mvn}"
> > > > > >> dir="${basedir}/maven-release-plugin"
> > > > > >> > > > failonerror="true" >
> > > > > >> > > > <arg
> value="${continueOption}" />
> > > > > >> > > > <arg value="clean" />
> > > > > >> > > > <arg value="install" />
> > > > > >> > > > </exec>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Then you should be able to set in your
> > > local.properties:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > continueOption=-rf JewelExample
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > You will probably need to use different
> names
> > for
> > > each
> > > > > call to
> > > > > >> Maven so
> > > > > >> > > > subsequent Maven calls don't pick up the
> same
> > > option.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > HTH,
> > > > > >> > > > -Alex
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On 10/4/18, 11:58 AM, "OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <
> > > > > >> bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:48 AM Alex
> Harui
> > > > > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Om, it looks like you are still
> deleting
> > and
> > > > > recreating
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > branches.
> > > > > >> > > > > Does this mean you have never
> completed
> > the
> > > > > make_branches
> > > > > >> step?
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Yes, I delete the tags, branches
> (remote)
> > > each time
> > > > > >> something
> > > > > >> > fails.
> > > > > >> > > > Then
> > > > > >> > > > I do a global search for 0.9.5 and
> replace
> > it
> > > with
> > > > > 0.9.4
> > > > > >> (some 200+
> > > > > >> > > > files
> > > > > >> > > > across 3 repos), then push them into
> > > remote/develop.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Then I do the make_branches step
> first.
> > Then
> > > do a
> > > > > git push
> > > > > >> in
> > > > > >> > > > roayale-asjs
> > > > > >> > > > as per the instructions in the
> commandline.
> > I
> > > have
> > > > > never
> > > > > >> had issues
> > > > > >> > > > with
> > > > > >> > > > this step. It is always the maven
> step that
> > > fails
> > > > > for some
> > > > > >> reason
> > > > > >> > or
> > > > > >> > > > the
> > > > > >> > > > other.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Is make_branches failing trying to
> run a
> > > build in
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> develop
> > > > > >> > > branch
> > > > > >> > > > and
> > > > > >> > > > > uploading 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT artifacts?
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > No
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > I supposed we could try to find a
> way to
> > > skip
> > > > that,
> > > > > but
> > > > > >> you will
> > > > > >> > > need
> > > > > >> > > > > reliable uploading to
> repository.a.o to be
> > > an RM
> > > > > without
> > > > > >> going
> > > > > >> > > crazy.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Hmm, I use the same internet
> connection for
> > > personal
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> work
> > > > > >> > related
> > > > > >> > > > activities. I don't usually have
> issues
> > with
> > > > > internet.
> > > > > >> Either we
> > > > > >> > > are
> > > > > >> > > > very
> > > > > >> > > > unlucky here or we need a more
> reselient way
> > > to pick
> > > > > up
> > > > > >> things if
> > > > > >> > we
> > > > > >> > > > lose
> > > > > >> > > > internet connectivity momentarily.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > It takes upwards of 90 minutes of
> uploading
> > > stuff. I
> > > > > dont
> > > > > >> do this
> > > > > >> > > kind
> > > > > >> > > > of
> > > > > >> > > > uploading for my regular work, so
> that is
> > > probably I
> > > > > have
> > > > > >> never hit
> > > > > >> > > > this
> > > > > >> > > > issue before.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > I still think that looking into the
> > > 'resume-from'
> > > > > directive
> > > > > >> in
> > > > > >> > maven
> > > > > >> > > is
> > > > > >> > > > worthwhile.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > Om
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > -Alex
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On 10/3/18, 2:11 PM, "OmPrakash
> > Muppirala" <
> > > > > >> bigosma...@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:02 PM
> Alex
> > > Harui
> > > > > >> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Om,
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Does anything deploy, or is
> that the
> > > first
> > > > > thing
> > > > > >> that is
> > > > > >> > > > attempted to
> > > > > >> > > > > > deploy? I found this article
> that
> > > might
> > > > help:
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.apigee.com%2Fquestions%2F50756%2Funable-to-deploy-using-maven-script-due-to-error-r.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=wNctwU8V5HRTfTnDGsmn7Xs22H%2BDKZqUV1Meq516VQI%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > It deployed a lot of artifacts
> before
> > > hitting
> > > > > this
> > > > > >> error. I
> > > > > >> > > > don't see
> > > > > >> > > > > anything special with this
> artifact.
> > > So, I am
> > > > > >> guessing that
> > > > > >> > it
> > > > > >> > > > was a
> > > > > >> > > > > momentary bad connection that
> caused
> > > this.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > I would be concerned about
> > restarting
> > > from
> > > > the
> > > > > >> middle of a
> > > > > >> > > > Maven
> > > > > >> > > > > call. I
> > > > > >> > > > > > suppose you could try it, but
> what
> > if
> > > it
> > > > > skipped an
> > > > > >> > artifact?
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > The maven error message
> explicitly
> > says
> > > this:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
After
> > > correcting
> > > > the
> > > > > >> problems, you
> > > > > >> > > can
> > > > > >> > > > > resume
> > > > > >> > > > > the build with the command
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
mvn
> > > <goals> -rf
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > :Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > There should be Ant targets
> for
> > > starting
> > > > only
> > > > > on
> > > > > >> > royale-asjs
> > > > > >> > > if
> > > > > >> > > > > > royale-compiler and
> royale=typedefs
> > > worked
> > > > ok.
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > HTH,
> > > > > >> > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > On 10/3/18, 11:58 AM,
> "OmPrakash
> > > Muppirala"
> > > > <
> > > > > >> > > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Another suggestion I have
> is -
> > > can we do
> > > > > all
> > > > > >> the pushes
> > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > >> > > > > remote after
> > > > > >> > > > > > everything is done
> locally?
> > That
> > > way,
> > > > if
> > > > > >> something
> > > > > >> > goes
> > > > > >> > > > wrong
> > > > > >> > > > > > halfway, we
> > > > > >> > > > > > can just delete the
> royale-*
> > dirs
> > > > locally
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> rerun the
> > > > > >> > > > > > releasecandiate ant
> > > > > >> > > > > > script?
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Not sure if this is an
> easy
> > > change?
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > > Om
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at
> 11:42 AM
> > > > OmPrakash
> > > > > >> Muppirala <
> > > > > >> > > > > > bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Okay, I tried a couple
> of
> > times
> > > and I
> > > > > have
> > > > > >> started
> > > > > >> > > > getting
> > > > > >> > > > > `SSL peer
> > > > > >> > > > > > shut
> > > > > >> > > > > > > down incorrectly
errors`
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [INFO]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [INFO]
> > BUILD
> > > > FAILURE
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [INFO]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [INFO]
> > Total
> > > time:
> > > > > 16:04
> > > > > >> min
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [INFO]
> > > Finished at:
> > > > > >> > > > > 2018-10-03T11:38:49-07:00
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [INFO]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > > Failed to
> > > > > execute
> > > > > >> goal
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy
> > > > > >> > > > > > (default-deploy)
> > > > > >> > > > > > > on project
> > > > > >> > Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme:
> > > > > >> > > > Failed
> > > > > >> > > > > to
> > > > > >> > > > > > deploy
> > > > > >> > > > > > > artifacts: Could not
> transfer
> > > artifact
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme:swc:0.9.4
> > > > > >> > > > > > > from/to
> apache.releases.https
> > (
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fservice%2Flocal%2Fstaging%2Fdeploy%2Fmaven2&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=ZM%2BMaKfwhgEZBVJ62PLLI0hJkYexNV4MZrHM%2BeNOI7U%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >> > > > > > ):
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Remote host closed
> connection
> > > during
> > > > > >> handshake: SSL
> > > > > >> > > peer
> > > > > >> > > > shut
> > > > > >> > > > > down
> > > > > >> > > > > > > incorrectly -> [Help 1]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR] To
> > > see the
> > > > > full
> > > > > >> stack
> > > > > >> > trace
> > > > > >> > > > of the
> > > > > >> > > > > errors,
> > > > > >> > > > > > > re-run Maven with the
-e
> > switch.
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > > Re-run
> > > > Maven
> > > > > using
> > > > > >> the -X
> > > > > >> > > > switch to
> > > > > >> > > > > enable
> > > > > >> > > > > > > full debug logging.
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR] For
> > > more
> > > > > >> information about
> > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > >> > > > > errors and
> > > > > >> > > > > > > possible solutions,
> please
> > read
> > > the
> > > > > following
> > > > > >> > articles:
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > > [Help 1]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C51e386cbf09c4782574908d63003074b%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636749186919575507&sdata=RizUeW9ds1422yghoZuoP8BYoQpFI1p823DoWSLUS7o%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > After
> > > > > correcting
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > > problems, you
> > > > > >> > > > > can
> > > > > >> > > > > > resume
> > > > > >> > > > > > > the build with the
> command
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> [ERROR]
> > mvn
> > > > > <goals> -rf
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > :Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sunflower-Theme
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [exec] [INFO]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > I am guessing it is a
> bad
> > > internet
> > > > > >> connection. I am
> > > > > >> > > > wondering
> > > > > >> > > > > if we
> > > > > >> > > > > > can
> > > > > >> > > > > > > pass a -rf (resume
from)
> > option
> > > to the
> > > > > maven
> > > > > >> call
> > > > > >> > from
> > > > > >> > > > ant?
> > > > > >> > > > > > Otherwise
> > > > > >> > > > > > > doing all this from
> scratch
> > > everytime
> > > > > is a
> > > > > >> big pain.
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Om
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at
> 12:47
> > AM
> > > Alex
> > > > > Harui
> > > > > >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >> Looks like it was a
> missing [
> > > > > >>
