Hi Greg,

Wow! Browsing the branch and must say. Amazing work! :)

For small-messages I think one way to try it would be test against our real
app turning them on and see what happens. Having now IExternalizable
working should be enough for RPC using the three messages that use that (I
think there's no more), and I think those classes are available and listed
in the swc since many months.

Since this week-end I'm on trip, I'll be able to join to this testing on my
Monday evening.

I think this improvements will be very important for all of us and
including people coming to migrate from flex, like other the ones that come
some months ago with ColdFusion or AMFPHP backends that couldn't get AMF
work, having this so close to flash/flex should help those people to
finally get it work.

Carlos



El vie., 1 mar. 2019 a las 7:23, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>) escribió:

> Ok, thanks Alex. I will not do that then. I did not prefix the names with
> 'feature' anyway...
> I will push to 'amf_updates' branch for compiler and asjs inside the next
> couple of hours. I have more to do on this work, but it's moving forward -
> dynamic and IExternalizable are now supported, although I have not tested
> the short messaging stuff yet.
> I updated mxroyale\RemoteObjectAMFTest to use mxArrayCollection and that is
> working.
>
> But there will be some things to discuss (will follow up on list tomorrow)
> and I still have a few more things queued up to work on with AMFBinaryData
> (IDynamicPropertyWriter, XML, Vectors - I did not test/check these yet, and
> perhaps something for Dictionary)
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:56 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't checked on the Maven Pipeline to see if it is operational or
> > not.  IIRC, it was the only thing that required all 3 branches to have
> the
> > same name, and I think it had to start with feature/ or release/.  For
> the
> > rest of us, it doesn't matter.  You checkout the branch you want and
> build
> > it and it will end up being the code that is used.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 2/28/19, 9:34 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Alex - or anyone else who knows - for setting up a compilable
> > branch, am
> >     I supposed to commit to the same branch name in all three of : as-js,
> >     typedefs and compiler ? I have only changes in asjs and compiler. But
> > I can
> >     create a same name branch in typedefs as well if that is required....
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Greg
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to