Hi Greg, I finally could test AMF branch. I merged locally latest changes in compiler and asjs frameworks, to ensure to be to the latest. As well in our real project I tried all workflows and all worked great! So congrats for this great updates! :)
I'm going now to stop server and try to turn on small messages in BlazeDS to see what happens report here as I get results El vie., 1 mar. 2019 a las 9:26, Carlos Rovira (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Greg, > > Wow! Browsing the branch and must say. Amazing work! :) > > For small-messages I think one way to try it would be test against our > real app turning them on and see what happens. Having now IExternalizable > working should be enough for RPC using the three messages that use that (I > think there's no more), and I think those classes are available and listed > in the swc since many months. > > Since this week-end I'm on trip, I'll be able to join to this testing on > my Monday evening. > > I think this improvements will be very important for all of us and > including people coming to migrate from flex, like other the ones that come > some months ago with ColdFusion or AMFPHP backends that couldn't get AMF > work, having this so close to flash/flex should help those people to > finally get it work. > > Carlos > > > > El vie., 1 mar. 2019 a las 7:23, Greg Dove (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > >> Ok, thanks Alex. I will not do that then. I did not prefix the names with >> 'feature' anyway... >> I will push to 'amf_updates' branch for compiler and asjs inside the next >> couple of hours. I have more to do on this work, but it's moving forward - >> dynamic and IExternalizable are now supported, although I have not tested >> the short messaging stuff yet. >> I updated mxroyale\RemoteObjectAMFTest to use mxArrayCollection and that >> is >> working. >> >> But there will be some things to discuss (will follow up on list tomorrow) >> and I still have a few more things queued up to work on with AMFBinaryData >> (IDynamicPropertyWriter, XML, Vectors - I did not test/check these yet, >> and >> perhaps something for Dictionary) >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:56 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > I haven't checked on the Maven Pipeline to see if it is operational or >> > not. IIRC, it was the only thing that required all 3 branches to have >> the >> > same name, and I think it had to start with feature/ or release/. For >> the >> > rest of us, it doesn't matter. You checkout the branch you want and >> build >> > it and it will end up being the code that is used. >> > >> > HTH, >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 2/28/19, 9:34 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Alex - or anyone else who knows - for setting up a compilable >> > branch, am >> > I supposed to commit to the same branch name in all three of : >> as-js, >> > typedefs and compiler ? I have only changes in asjs and compiler. >> But >> > I can >> > create a same name branch in typedefs as well if that is >> required.... >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Greg >> > >> > >> > >> > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
