Hi, sorry, but I invert what I want to say. We currently have:
visible: this is like includeInLayout + visible in flex since it changes "display" between "none" and "block" or "flex" right? if I put visible to false, display is "none", and this makes the object disappear from screen and also don't compute in html layout, so in flex will be like visible=false and includeInLayout= false if I put visible to true, display is "block"/"flex", and this makes the object visible in screen and depending on things like position compute in layout, so in flex will be like visible=true and includeInLayout= true This use to be the main use we all do most of the times. in the other hand we have "visibility", that makes the object not visible but included in layout (still is there occupying some space in screen) so in flex will be like visible=true or false but includeInLayout= true always. I found this useful under certain circumstances. For example in Wizard I'm adding transitions and navigation buttons should better maintain the space but disappear, instead of make the slide grow or shrink. So I think this will be useful for others. Maybe since we did visible not equal to flex, now "includeInLayout" has no sense.. but still a bead for "visibility" can be useful @Piotr: don't think I understand correctly your message. You say Disable/Enable is for visibility? El dom., 7 abr. 2019 a las 16:26, Harbs (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Why not just use “visible”? > > > On Apr 7, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > we can get flex "includedInLayout" using css "visibility" property (with > > visible/hidden) > > > > I suppose it's not in UIBase for if PAYG reasons, so I can add it as a > bead > > if there's no other proposal. > > > > thanks > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
