Hi Carlos, Nope I said that I could be wrong that this kind of stuff exists. I could go wrong with my thinking and we have only bead for disable/enable stuff.
Thanks, Piotr niedz., 7 kwi 2019 o 23:34 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> napisał(a): > Hi, > > sorry, but I invert what I want to say. We currently have: > > visible: this is like includeInLayout + visible in flex since it changes > "display" between "none" and "block" or "flex" right? > if I put visible to false, display is "none", and this makes the object > disappear from screen and also don't compute in html layout, so in flex > will be like visible=false and includeInLayout= false > if I put visible to true, display is "block"/"flex", and this makes the > object visible in screen and depending on things like position compute in > layout, > so in flex will be like visible=true and includeInLayout= true > This use to be the main use we all do most of the times. > > in the other hand we have "visibility", that makes the object not visible > but included in layout (still is there occupying some space in screen) > so in flex will be like visible=true or false but includeInLayout= true > always. > > I found this useful under certain circumstances. For example in Wizard I'm > adding transitions and navigation buttons should better maintain the space > but disappear, instead of make the slide grow or shrink. So I think this > will be useful for others. > > Maybe since we did visible not equal to flex, now "includeInLayout" has no > sense.. but still a bead for "visibility" can be useful > > @Piotr: don't think I understand correctly your message. You say > Disable/Enable is for visibility? > > > > El dom., 7 abr. 2019 a las 16:26, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > Why not just use “visible”? > > > > > On Apr 7, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we can get flex "includedInLayout" using css "visibility" property > (with > > > visible/hidden) > > > > > > I suppose it's not in UIBase for if PAYG reasons, so I can add it as a > > bead > > > if there's no other proposal. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
