+1.

> On Jul 9, 2019, at 6:43 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> IMO, adding an API for missing.js should only be done for APIs that are truly 
> cross-browser.  If an API requires a polyfill, then if we add it to 
> missing.js and someone tries to use it on the browser that doesn't support 
> it, it won't work for them without the polyfill.
> 
> Either there should be a separate typedefs SWC for it, or we should see what 
> changes to the toolchain are needed to allow the missing API to be supplied 
> by a source extern in the SWC that uses it.

Reply via email to