Hi,

having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I tried
ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm trying to build with Maven
with a clean(empty) .m2.

packaged to test in RC2 is: apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz

Instructions in src are the following:

Building Royale With Apache Maven

=================================


Royale requires Maven 3.3.9 or greater to be installed on your computer.


To build Royale with Apache Maven, run Maven in the 3 folders as follows:


royale-compiler:  mvn clean install -P -main,utils

royale-compiler:  mvn clean install

royale-typedefs:  mvn clean install

royale-asjs:      mvn clean install


When complete, you should be able to use the Maven archetypes in
royale-asjs/archetypes

to build Royale applications.



 from downloaded src/royale-compiler folder I run first:

mvn clean install -P -main,utils

This was ok

Then in the same compiler folder run:

mvn clean install

This time I get this error:


[*INFO*]
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*

[*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:*

[*INFO*]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... *SUCCESS* [
1.763 s]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... *SUCCESS*
[01:07 min]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ *SUCCESS* [
2.307 s]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... *SUCCESS* [
49.839 s]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. *FAILURE* [
8.878 s]

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks ................ *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. *SKIPPED*

[*INFO*]
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*

[*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*

[*INFO*]
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*

[*INFO*] Total time:  02:18 min

[*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T12:51:06+02:00

[*INFO*]
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*

[*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
apache-release (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases>)* -> *[Help
1]*

[*ERROR*]

[*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
*-e* switch.

[*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging.






El vie., 20 sept. 2019 a las 18:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
[email protected]>) escribió:

> Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.
>
> Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in
> several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to instruct
> user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on
> preparing and testing another RC - even if someone is paying me for that.
>
> Let's hear from others.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:18 Alex Harui <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>
> > I don't know.  Would be nice to get other's opinions.  We make these
> > attempts to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so when
> > that workflow isn't working it doesn't make us look good.  FWIW, if you
> > clone the repo and try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should
> > probably fail the same way.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/19/19, 11:21 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Alex,
> >
> >     I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for not
> >     working build without some env. variables is just have section Known
> > issues
> >     in our announcement?
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Piotr
> >
> >     pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>
> >     napisał(a):
> >
> >     > Hi Josh,
> >     >
> >     > Maybe you could commit that to develop?
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > Piotr
> >     >
> >     > czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala <[email protected]>
> >     > napisał(a):
> >     >
> >     >> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
> >     >> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this
> > section
> >     >> where the framework is built:
> >     >>
> >     >> <exec executable="${mvn}"
> >     >> dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> >     >> failonerror="true">
> >     >>     <arg value="-P"/>
> >     >>     <arg value="generate-swcs-for-swf,main"/>
> >     >>     <arg value="clean"/>
> >     >>     <arg value="install"/>
> >     >> </exec>
> >     >>
> >     >> --
> >     >> Josh Tynjala
> >     >> Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=seKWdtHYwJnr10AgVph8%2BOgYgk5746cRnEBpGNnKgwM%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> >     >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >> > This is the discussion thread.
> >     >> >
> >     >> > Thanks,
> >     >> > Piotr
> >     >>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     >
> >     > Piotr Zarzycki
> >     >
> >     > Patreon: *
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >*
> >     >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >     Patreon: *
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >     <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >*
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to