Hmm...Approval script is building stuff for you by Maven. Modify it as Josh
suggested and run according to instruction in Voting thread.

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 1:06 PM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I tried
> ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm trying to build with Maven
> with a clean(empty) .m2.
>
> packaged to test in RC2 is: apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
>
> Instructions in src are the following:
>
> Building Royale With Apache Maven
>
> =================================
>
>
> Royale requires Maven 3.3.9 or greater to be installed on your computer.
>
>
> To build Royale with Apache Maven, run Maven in the 3 folders as follows:
>
>
> royale-compiler:  mvn clean install -P -main,utils
>
> royale-compiler:  mvn clean install
>
> royale-typedefs:  mvn clean install
>
> royale-asjs:      mvn clean install
>
>
> When complete, you should be able to use the Maven archetypes in
> royale-asjs/archetypes
>
> to build Royale applications.
>
>
>
>  from downloaded src/royale-compiler folder I run first:
>
> mvn clean install -P -main,utils
>
> This was ok
>
> Then in the same compiler folder run:
>
> mvn clean install
>
> This time I get this error:
>
>
> [*INFO*]
> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:*
>
> [*INFO*]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... *SUCCESS* [
> 1.763 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... *SUCCESS*
> [01:07 min]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ *SUCCESS* [
> 2.307 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... *SUCCESS* [
> 49.839 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. *FAILURE* [
> 8.878 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks ................ *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*]
> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
>
> [*INFO*]
> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> [*INFO*] Total time:  02:18 min
>
> [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T12:51:06+02:00
>
> [*INFO*]
> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> apache-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases>)* -> *[Help
> 1]*
>
> [*ERROR*]
>
> [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> *-e* switch.
>
> [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El vie., 20 sept. 2019 a las 18:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> [email protected]>) escribió:
>
> > Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.
> >
> > Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in
> > several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to
> instruct
> > user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on
> > preparing and testing another RC - even if someone is paying me for that.
> >
> > Let's hear from others.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:18 Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > I don't know.  Would be nice to get other's opinions.  We make these
> > > attempts to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so
> when
> > > that workflow isn't working it doesn't make us look good.  FWIW, if you
> > > clone the repo and try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should
> > > probably fail the same way.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/19/19, 11:21 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >     Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >     I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for
> not
> > >     working build without some env. variables is just have section
> Known
> > > issues
> > >     in our announcement?
> > >
> > >     Thanks,
> > >     Piotr
> > >
> > >     pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]
> >
> > >     napisał(a):
> > >
> > >     > Hi Josh,
> > >     >
> > >     > Maybe you could commit that to develop?
> > >     >
> > >     > Thanks,
> > >     > Piotr
> > >     >
> > >     > czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala <
> [email protected]>
> > >     > napisał(a):
> > >     >
> > >     >> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running
> the
> > >     >> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this
> > > section
> > >     >> where the framework is built:
> > >     >>
> > >     >> <exec executable="${mvn}"
> > >     >> dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > >     >> failonerror="true">
> > >     >>     <arg value="-P"/>
> > >     >>     <arg value="generate-swcs-for-swf,main"/>
> > >     >>     <arg value="clean"/>
> > >     >>     <arg value="install"/>
> > >     >> </exec>
> > >     >>
> > >     >> --
> > >     >> Josh Tynjala
> > >     >> Bowler Hat LLC <
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=seKWdtHYwJnr10AgVph8%2BOgYgk5746cRnEBpGNnKgwM%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >
> > >     >>
> > >     >>
> > >     >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> > >     >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >     >>
> > >     >> > This is the discussion thread.
> > >     >> >
> > >     >> > Thanks,
> > >     >> > Piotr
> > >     >>
> > >     >
> > >     >
> > >     > --
> > >     >
> > >     > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >     >
> > >     > Patreon: *
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >     > <
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >*
> > >     >
> > >
> > >
> > >     --
> > >
> > >     Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > >     Patreon: *
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > >     <
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366&amp;sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > > >*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>

Reply via email to