I hope the few people building from sources would try with actual instructions and if they have problems come to the list and try to solve it with our help, so we can improve scripts and build process learning from that kind of experiences.
El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 14:05, Andrew Wetmore (<cottag...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Yes: the PERFECT would be clear and simple instructions that work and do > not scare people away. We do not seem to have those. I thought the > discussion was whether to go forward with the release anyhow, since the > number of users who build from source is smaller than the number who use > the compiled binaries, or delay the release until we get the instructions > right. > > My suggestion related to the first option, to make sure that, if we go > ahead with the release including insufficient build instructions, that we > warn people about that. That way we show that we know it's an issue, rather > than looking like we don't know or, worse, don't care. > > a > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:28 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > ok I understand. > > > > IMHO, instructions should be as easy as possible. People that see steps > > depending on things that are not clear will be mostly lost and with high > > probability of never come back. Royale SDK is a complex technology with > > many pieces involved, we should make the install process as simple as > > possible hidding all that complexity if we want to succeed. The main > point > > that is running against us is that complexity. > > > > just my 2... > > > > > > > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
