Hi, El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 17:17, Alex Harui (<[email protected]>) escribió:
> IMO we still need to run Ant at some point, so why not use Ant for > scripting? That's what it is meant for. > Our perception is that trying to force 2 builds (three, four or more if we add new build systems in the future) to the *release* (not talking about *building* here) is what makes the whole process not reliable. That's the point. Instead, if we just focus on just one, could be ANT, Maven (**) or any other new one, and then ensure the other(s) still work and are checked post release, makes remove all the old problems and make the process much more reliable. I think that's a fact and something that we can foresee for sure. (**) we propose Maven for this (just release) and not (Ant), since is the most used for releasing and CI due to numbers [1], and hence the most prepared for the task and the one that should allow us to be updated in the future without much hassle or breaking things. [1] https://twitter.com/ChristoferDutz/status/1240219399551934473 -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
