Agreed. Just do it! You shouldn't need consensus here. If it's as much better as you claim it will be, I don't see anyone refusing to switch to the new process. However, if you insist on consensus, let this be my +1.
However, someone else may want to try doing a release with the old process in the meantime. With that in mind, before you get started on the new process, you should ensure that the old one is not still broken from the recent Maven build changes. (It sounds like Chris is already trying to fix this, so great!) -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 9:50 AM OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> wrote: > Carlos, Chris, > > There is nothing stopping you from building something from scratch. There > is no need to convince anyone. Please start committing. > > I think Alex and others have made their points clearly. I don't see a > reason to continue rehashing the same points over and over. > > As long as the current Ant based build/release is not broken, everyone > should be happy, or at least learn to live with it. > > That said, how can I help with your effort š? > > Thanks, > Om > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, 9:38 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > El miĆ©., 18 mar. 2020 a las 17:12, Alex Harui (<[email protected] > >) > > escribiĆ³: > > > > > The proposal I'm seeing takes us back a few years to when others > > couldnāt > > > create a release. > > > > > > As I posted in the other thread just a few minutes ago, it's not about to > > go back and coninue. Our propose is to create something new from scratch, > > so all that old problems should just gone. > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > >
