https://github.com/royale-extras <https://github.com/royale-extras>
I can add you to the org if you’d like. > On Jul 1, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > The phrase "royale-extreas" went by on this thread or another one. What and > where is that? > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:55 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> I don't know right now the internals of GSAP or other solutions, but my >> point is, no matter how good it's...is proprietary, so user can take it and >> use it in its projects, but we should not go that route, since Royale is >> Apache and OS. >> >> Then we can see performance. GSAP could be the most performant, but I >> think there's enough standard web solutions right now that are very good >> and we can use in the right way with a compatible license. >> >> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 16:15, Piotr Zarzycki (< >> [email protected]>) >> escribió: >> >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> It depends how good with implementation we can be vs. GSAP - I have no >> idea >>> how that library is build - Maybe it's using the same API as you are >> going >>> to use? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 3:58 PM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Harbs, >>>> >>>> Since GSAP is proprietary I prefer go another route, that could be not >> as >>>> performant as GSAP, but I think we can sacrifice a bit there ensuring >> we >>>> keep on ALv2. >>>> I think what we really need in most effects is easy to get those days >>> with >>>> Animate API. I think it is more interesting to get Animate API working >> on >>>> HTMLElement (that you already planned to do on royale extras) to avoid >>>> bracket access, and we can get many effects working that way with a >> good >>>> performance. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 11:36, Harbs (<[email protected]>) >>>> escribió: >>>> >>>>> Yes. GSAP is a proprietary license. >>>>> >>>>> The cleanest way to add GSAP support would be with a library that’s >>>>> external to Royale. We could even do that on royale-extras which is >> not >>>>> strictly an Apache entity. >>>>> >>>>> While GSAP support would be great for those who want to use it, I was >>>>> actually suggesting to use the *lessons* from the GSAP page on >> getting >>>>> performance right. >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Carlos Rovira < >> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool, >>>>>> >>>>>> I must say that actually we are not able to use animations in >>>>>> CSS. @keyframe is compiling with no errors, but compiler doesn't >> bake >>>> it >>>>> in >>>>>> the final App.css. >>>>>> So until that bug is solved I'm working just with Animation js API >>>>>> Anyway, I think we need to solve that bug and give people options, >>>>> although >>>>>> is clear that GSAP is better. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think about use GSAP as part of Royale Effects? will be >>>> some >>>>>> license issue? or we could use it? >>>>>> >>>>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 9:53, Harbs (<[email protected]>) >>>>> escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Most significantly, see how poorly css transitions actually >> perform. >>>> Web >>>>>>> Animations seem to do much better than css transitions. I don’t >>> think >>>>>>> anything beats GSAP though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When and if we work on improved Effects, there’s a GSAP >> performance >>>>> page >>>>>>> which is really useful for comparing different methods of >> animations >>>> and >>>>>>> how well they perform: >>>>>>>> https://greensock.com/js/speed.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Carlos Rovira < >>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have in mind to do something about Effects in Jewel at some >>> point. >>>>> For >>>>>>>>> now we have the Effects library already pointed by Harbs. >>>>>>>>> For Jewel my plan is to continue with the philosophy of adding >>>> through >>>>>>> CSS >>>>>>>>> as other things done in Jewel. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 8:26, Harbs (<[email protected] >>> ) >>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Take a look at the org.apache.royale.effects package in the >>>> “Effects” >>>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> See manualtests/EffectsExample for some sample usage. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 4:17 AM, Hugo Ferreira < >>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How to apply a simple standard effect (ex: Fade, Zoom, etc >> ...) >>> ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Carlos Rovira >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
