Not necessary at this point. I was mainly curious, as it was a new term to me.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:04 PM Harbs <[email protected]> wrote: > https://github.com/royale-extras <https://github.com/royale-extras> > > I can add you to the org if you’d like. > > > On Jul 1, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The phrase "royale-extreas" went by on this thread or another one. What > and > > where is that? > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:55 AM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Piotr, > >> > >> I don't know right now the internals of GSAP or other solutions, but my > >> point is, no matter how good it's...is proprietary, so user can take it > and > >> use it in its projects, but we should not go that route, since Royale is > >> Apache and OS. > >> > >> Then we can see performance. GSAP could be the most performant, but I > >> think there's enough standard web solutions right now that are very good > >> and we can use in the right way with a compatible license. > >> > >> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 16:15, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> [email protected]>) > >> escribió: > >> > >>> Hi Carlos, > >>> > >>> It depends how good with implementation we can be vs. GSAP - I have no > >> idea > >>> how that library is build - Maybe it's using the same API as you are > >> going > >>> to use? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Piotr > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 3:58 PM Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Harbs, > >>>> > >>>> Since GSAP is proprietary I prefer go another route, that could be not > >> as > >>>> performant as GSAP, but I think we can sacrifice a bit there ensuring > >> we > >>>> keep on ALv2. > >>>> I think what we really need in most effects is easy to get those days > >>> with > >>>> Animate API. I think it is more interesting to get Animate API working > >> on > >>>> HTMLElement (that you already planned to do on royale extras) to avoid > >>>> bracket access, and we can get many effects working that way with a > >> good > >>>> performance. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 11:36, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > >>>> escribió: > >>>> > >>>>> Yes. GSAP is a proprietary license. > >>>>> > >>>>> The cleanest way to add GSAP support would be with a library that’s > >>>>> external to Royale. We could even do that on royale-extras which is > >> not > >>>>> strictly an Apache entity. > >>>>> > >>>>> While GSAP support would be great for those who want to use it, I was > >>>>> actually suggesting to use the *lessons* from the GSAP page on > >> getting > >>>>> performance right. > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 12:00 PM, Carlos Rovira < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cool, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I must say that actually we are not able to use animations in > >>>>>> CSS. @keyframe is compiling with no errors, but compiler doesn't > >> bake > >>>> it > >>>>> in > >>>>>> the final App.css. > >>>>>> So until that bug is solved I'm working just with Animation js API > >>>>>> Anyway, I think we need to solve that bug and give people options, > >>>>> although > >>>>>> is clear that GSAP is better. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you think about use GSAP as part of Royale Effects? will be > >>>> some > >>>>>> license issue? or we could use it? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 9:53, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > >>>>> escribió: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Most significantly, see how poorly css transitions actually > >> perform. > >>>> Web > >>>>>>> Animations seem to do much better than css transitions. I don’t > >>> think > >>>>>>> anything beats GSAP though. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> When and if we work on improved Effects, there’s a GSAP > >> performance > >>>>> page > >>>>>>> which is really useful for comparing different methods of > >> animations > >>>> and > >>>>>>> how well they perform: > >>>>>>>> https://greensock.com/js/speed.html > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Carlos Rovira < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have in mind to do something about Effects in Jewel at some > >>> point. > >>>>> For > >>>>>>>>> now we have the Effects library already pointed by Harbs. > >>>>>>>>> For Jewel my plan is to continue with the philosophy of adding > >>>> through > >>>>>>> CSS > >>>>>>>>> as other things done in Jewel. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> El mié., 1 jul. 2020 a las 8:26, Harbs (<[email protected] > >>> ) > >>>>>>> escribió: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Take a look at the org.apache.royale.effects package in the > >>>> “Effects” > >>>>>>>>>> project. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> See manualtests/EffectsExample for some sample usage. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 4:17 AM, Hugo Ferreira < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> How to apply a simple standard effect (ex: Fade, Zoom, etc > >> ...) > >>> ? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
