Hi Piotr, no. I think you refer to the refactor in DataGrid to make the header not tied to ButtonBar. In Jewel DataGrid the header is now an interface IDataGridHeader so we can switch between implementations. That was needed to improve the sorting and give visuals for arrow buttons (up/down). But I still couldn't reach it.
So HeaderList was a concept I had in mind that comes from a use I did in flex that was manual that implies a normal list and a separated header where the header parts and the renderer parts was sync on width. That require to set width equal manually for each pair in header and in renderer. But I found some problems trying to make it a component for general use. Maybe today could be more easy to do, but will require time. El jue., 15 oct. 2020 a las 14:09, Piotr Zarzycki (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Carlos, > > I saw some time ago commits related to header - did you implement that > header list which you have mention and is it in use for header in DG ? > > Thanks, > Piotr > > śr., 6 maj 2020 o 15:46 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > no, HeaderList is a simple List, where item renders for each item are a > > complete row. In addition we add an extra header zone for the name of > each > > "column". This arrangement use to show results very similar to the image > > example I posted in this thread yesterday. So this means that width of a > > "column" is the width you set for a concrete part of the item renderer > and > > you should be able to use pixel or percentage widths. > > > > The tricky part is how to sync widths of the header parts (that represent > > columns) match render parts. When I used this concept in Flex I use to > > define columns as usual, but widths must to be synced manually in code. > > Maybe this time, I can figure some way to make it automatic. > > > > HTH > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > El mar., 5 may. 2020 a las 17:47, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > [email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > In "1" are you saying that each row would be a HeaderList type of > object > > ? > > > - This is your idea? > > > > > > wt., 5 maj 2020 o 17:04 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > > > > > I was trying to expose a plan to do and I see mainly two routes: > > > > > > > > 1 List/VirtualList > > > > 2 Table (will need VirtualTable too) > > > > > > > > If we go 1 (List/VirtualList), then will have a HeaderList that is > > > > basically a DG without more implications (sorting, editing, column > > > > reordering....), and I think that solve your inmediate problem with > > > > variable row heights. So next thing could be DataGrid extending > > > HeaderList. > > > > The 3-4 points at the end are the complciated things to solve if we > go > > > that > > > > route, and maybe we can think on some bead infrastructure (like > > > > initializers on renderers) to solve it. > > > > > > > > For 2 (Table route), the main problem I see is to solve scrolling for > > > body > > > > part. but other things will probably be easier. > > > > > > > > Hope that will be more clear. > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El mar., 5 may. 2020 a las 16:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > > [email protected]>) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > Carlos, > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately I don't understand which of your points resolve issue > > > from > > > > > this email thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > wt., 5 maj 2020 o 14:47 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > thinking about this a bit more: > > > > > > > > > > > > * Basic components are List and VirtualList > > > > > > * Then a HeaderList could be next step by just incorporating a > > Header > > > > > > (There will be a Virtual version too) > > > > > > * Next DataGrid could be a HeaderList that implements sorting. > > Maybe > > > > this > > > > > > will not be that hard since it implies order the complete Row. > > Again > > > > > > Virtual version should be considered > > > > > > > > > > > > Things to consider: > > > > > > - There's no "Cell" or CellRenderer considered > > > > > > - No editing capabilities since there's no cell concept > > > > > > - Switch column will be hard too > > > > > > - more DG things to consider?... > > > > > > > > > > > > These latest points maybe could be rethinked to add some bead > > > > > > infrastructure that support it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Another thing: Jewel Table could be as well other way to deal > with > > > > this. > > > > > If > > > > > > we add scrolling support for rows to maintain header on its own. > Or > > > > > someone > > > > > > see some problems with this approach? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El mar., 5 may. 2020 a las 12:34, Piotr Zarzycki (< > > > > > > [email protected]>) > > > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your thoughts. I believe you are right that we may > > have > > > a > > > > > > > headache in case of column reordering and sorting later on. > > However > > > > I'm > > > > > > > wondering whether this problems wouldn't be less painful than > > > current > > > > > > one. > > > > > > > To me DG in current state is unusable fully for bigger amount > of > > > data > > > > > and > > > > > > > I'm saying about data where you have more than 50 or 100 rows, > > not > > > > > > > necessary hundreds of rows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If there will be at least 1 cell among those 100 rows which > > expands > > > > > over > > > > > > > height of the row - it would be unreadable. - Here we go > > DataGrid > > > is > > > > > > > unusable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greg any thoughts about Carlos's potential sorting problems ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wt., 5 maj 2020 o 12:21 Carlos Rovira <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sorry for my late response here. flooded these days with lots > > of > > > > > > things. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the manage of row height is a problem since it needs > to > > > > sync > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the rest of columns, maybe this could be big problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About to go rows instead columns, I think that will work > better > > > for > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > case, but in that case I think we will have a problem with > > > > reordering > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > columns and order data in a column (asc, desc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another point to take into account. I think many people in > flex > > > use > > > > > to > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > multi column data list as DataGrid. While working on Flex I > end > > > > using > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > List that DataGrid with renders that represent various pieces > > of > > > > > > > > information (instead of DG cells). That worked very well. The > > > > problem > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > this approach is to handle a Header in an easy way. For this > > > reason > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > working this days in a "HeaderList" that is just that a List > > > with a > > > > > top > > > > > > > > header. This will be more efficient and also have a look and > > feel > > > > > more > > > > > > > > closer to modern apps nowadays [1] (I search quickly for > > > something > > > > > that > > > > > > > > shows a bit like what I want to expose) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think DG is needed when you need sorting columns or > > reordering, > > > > but > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > that's not the case, I think we're overusing it since we come > > > from > > > > a > > > > > > Flex > > > > > > > > background and this days list based solutions are simpler, > > > > beautiful > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > better. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't mean we don't have the problems stated here for > > > > > DataGrid, > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > saying that many of us should rethink where DG is worth it or > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr, about my time. I need to work on HeaderList since a > > client > > > > > > request > > > > > > > > me. If you need DG solutions, maybe you can start working on > > new > > > > > beads > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > will be a total replace of the actual ones so we can try it > and > > > see > > > > > if > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > way is a better approach or not (rows against columns). If > not > > > I'll > > > > > try > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > reach to it later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://ps.w.org/wpforo/assets/screenshot-1.png?rev=2121401 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El sáb., 2 may. 2020 a las 16:32, Alex Harui > > > > > (<[email protected] > > > > > > > >) > > > > > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think there is one perfect implementation. And > > that's > > > > why > > > > > we > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > beads. I think locked columns and individual cell > selection > > > are > > > > > much > > > > > > > > > easier with the current implementation, but I agree that > > > variable > > > > > row > > > > > > > > > height will probably be easier if all cells are in a row > > > > container. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We just need volunteers to create the other > implementations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/20, 12:17 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I absolutely agree with Greg. In fact before I read his > > > > email I > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > digging > > > > > > > > > into DataGrid and my initial thought was - when I set > > > > > rowHeight = > > > > > > > NaN > > > > > > > > > - My > > > > > > > > > rows should be adjusted automatically by the browser - > > why > > > it > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > happen? This is exactly because of that: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In browser I think things would be a lot easier if the > > > > > > > > > > internal 'lists' were managed as a single list of > > native > > > > rows > > > > > > > > > instead of > > > > > > > > > > composed columns of lists for DataGrids (specifically > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > > > browser). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos do you think it would be good to change that > > > > > > implementation > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > way as Greg is proposing ? Do you have time to work on > > > that ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > czw., 30 kwi 2020 o 20:48 Greg Dove < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the variable rowHeight - that works fine for > > > individual > > > > > > > lists, > > > > > > > > > but for > > > > > > > > > > datagrid that needs to match across the corresponding > > > > > renderers > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > item in the other columns, I did not check to see how > > > that > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't looked at the current Jewel implementation > of > > > > > > DataGrid > > > > > > > > > yet, but I > > > > > > > > > > do think that in general we have a lot of 'Flex'/swf > > > > thinking > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > > things work for DataGrid support, and I am not sure > it > > is > > > > the > > > > > > > best > > > > > > > > > way for > > > > > > > > > > browsers. I understand the need for this in emulation > > > > > > components, > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > perhaps even the implementation there is not > important > > if > > > > the > > > > > > > > > external api > > > > > > > > > > remains the same. In browser I think things would be > a > > > lot > > > > > > easier > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > internal 'lists' were managed as a single list of > > native > > > > rows > > > > > > > > > instead of > > > > > > > > > > composed columns of lists for DataGrids (specifically > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > > > browser). > > > > > > > > > > Columns could probably be managed then by custom > > > uid-style > > > > > > > classes > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > styling of their parts of the 'rows'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this probably covers off things like variable > > row > > > > > > height > > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > > height easily, and makes hover/selection at row level > > etc > > > > > > easier. > > > > > > > > And > > > > > > > > > > things like snapping the scrolling to the renderers > > (via > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > snap-to > > > > > > > > > > support for scroll snapping iiuc) should be much > easier > > > > also > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > think. Do I > > > > > > > > > > have time to work on this ? No - definitely not > anytime > > > > real > > > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > But I > > > > > > > > > > had been thinking about it after digging into > internals > > > of > > > > > > > DataGrid > > > > > > > > > > recently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:52 AM Alex Harui > > > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't looked at Jewel's Lists in detail, but if > > > they > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > switched to > > > > > > > > > > > scenario 2 (virtual rendering is probably a good > > > > default), > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > assumptions in the beads about fixed rowHeight. > But > > to > > > > > > handle > > > > > > > 5, > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > > start with the earlier beads that did 1 and forget > > > > virtual > > > > > > > > > rendering for > > > > > > > > > > > now. Then you should be able to not worry about > > fixed > > > > > > > rowheight > > > > > > > > > any more > > > > > > > > > > > since our vertical layouts for containers certainly > > > > handle > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > children heights. The beads for 5 should just set > a > > > > width > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > let > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > browser layout the children as blocks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/30/20, 8:47 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought I do understand what do you mean, but > > now > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > confused. > > > > > > > > > > > Where do > > > > > > > > > > > you see complexity ? In amount of rows and > > > > calculations > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > height > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > rows are ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > czw., 30 kwi 2020 o 17:44 Alex Harui > > > > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO, there are various tricks to handle a few > > > > > thousand > > > > > > > rows > > > > > > > > > if the > > > > > > > > > > > > renderers are simple. For example, feeding > in > > > rows > > > > > > with > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > timer. > > > > > > > > > > > If the > > > > > > > > > > > > computer can handle the memory required for a > > few > > > > > > > thousand > > > > > > > > > > renderers > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > main issue is the time to create and render > for > > > the > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > > time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is when you get out to 10,000 rows or the > > > > > renderers > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > complex/slow > > > > > > > > > > > > that it doesn't make sense to keep every > > renderer > > > > in > > > > > > > memory > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > that's why > > > > > > > > > > > > the complexity goes up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, schedule-wise, you might start with 5 > now > > > and > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > take more > > > > > > > > > > > time to > > > > > > > > > > > > work on 7 or 8. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/30/20, 8:33 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's hard to say, cause we are heavily > > using > > > > > > DataGrid > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > whole > > > > > > > > > > > > application. > > > > > > > > > > > > Each view contains some list. We have for > > > > example > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > view > > > > > > > > > > called > > > > > > > > > > > > "Correspondence" where in theory could be > > > > > hundreds > > > > > > > rows > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > maybe > > > > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > > > thousands. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > czw., 30 kwi 2020 o 17:27 Alex Harui > > > > > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr, how many rows of data are > there? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO, there are multiple scenarios of > > > > increasing > > > > > > > > > complexity. > > > > > > > > > > > That's > > > > > > > > > > > > one of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the reasons we have beads in Royale. > The > > > > vast > > > > > > > > > majority of > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > > > so far > > > > > > > > > > > > > has been to handle the simpler > scenarios. > > > > The > > > > > > > ones I > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > think of > > > > > > > > > > > > are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) few rows, fixed height, pixel > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) lots of rows, fixed height, pixel > > > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) lots of rows, fixed height, row > > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) few rows, fixed height, row > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5) few rows, variable height, pixel > > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6) few rows, variable height, row > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7) lots of rows, variable height, row > > > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8) lots of rows, variable height, pixel > > > > > scrolling > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've done 1 & 2 as beads. 5 should be > > > > > > > not-too-hard > > > > > > > > > > although I > > > > > > > > > > > > certainly > > > > > > > > > > > > > be wrong about that. If you can live > > with > > > 5, > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > if you > > > > > > > > > > > and/or > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > and other volunteers can come up with > the > > > > beads > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > There > > > > > > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > > > > > > big > > > > > > > > > > > > > jump in complexity after 5, especially > 7 > > & > > > 8. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/30/20, 6:54 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just for the reference when you > setup > > > > > > > > > variableRowHeight = > > > > > > > > > > > true > > > > > > > > > > > > in flex > > > > > > > > > > > > > DataGrid looks like that - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fibb.co%2FD7K9dLs&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609623612&sdata=sUdKOR6zDPo4XRfeXYfIB16e2X6yy6MmVDWvntYZ3no%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > czw., 30 kwi 2020 o 15:51 Piotr > > > Zarzycki > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also do not see any other > option > > > than > > > > > > > > generate > > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > > height > > > > > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > row > > > > > > > > > > > > > > based on the largest height in > each > > > > row. > > > > > It > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > definitely not > > > > > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > option to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > force people use rowHeight - That > > > model > > > > > > > > > definitely fail > > > > > > > > > > > in our > > > > > > > > > > > > > application > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where there are different portion > > of > > > > text > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > rows. One > > > > > > > > > > > row > > > > > > > > > > > > will have > > > > > > > > > > > > > 30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > height the second one 45 because > > > there > > > > > more > > > > > > > > text > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > display > > > > > > > > > > > > and so > > > > > > > > > > > > > on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now Jewel DataGrid doesn't > > have > > > > > > > > > > variableRowHeight. > > > > > > > > > > > To me > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in some form appear and if: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variableRowHeight = true - Row > > > height > > > > is > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > > > calculated > > > > > > > > > > > > > dynamically. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Each row can have different > height. > > > > Setup > > > > > > > > > rowHeight > > > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > option > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > true won't have affect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > variableRowHeight = false - > > default > > > > > > state. > > > > > > > > > Setup > > > > > > > > > > > rowHeight > > > > > > > > > > > > has some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > effect. Each row has some > > predefined > > > > > > default > > > > > > > > > height ex. > > > > > > > > > > > 35. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pt., 10 kwi 2020 o 17:35 Carlos > > > Rovira > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Piotr, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I was taking a look at the > issue. > > > Some > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > thoughts: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> List has "variableRowHeight: > true" > > > > > > (defined > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > Theme) > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > rowHeight > > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> NaN; by > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> default > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (as we can see in first List > > example > > > > in > > > > > > TDJ. > > > > > > > > We > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > > > heights > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> for each item renderer, while > > second > > > > > > example > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > rowHeight > > > > > > > > > > > > defined > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> that > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> makes all items has the same > > height > > > > > (Side > > > > > > > > note: > > > > > > > > > Here > > > > > > > > > > > there's > > > > > > > > > > > > a bug > > > > > > > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> defining rowHeight should remove > > > > > > > > > "variableRowHeight", > > > > > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > > > both > > > > > > > > > > > > > should be > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> mutually exclusive). > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> In DataGrid, we have lots of > Lists > > > > > > becoming > > > > > > > > > columns. > > > > > > > > > > So > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > make DG > > > > > > > > > > > > > work as > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> List I think we need to sync all > > > rows > > > > to > > > > > > > match > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > bigger > > > > > > > > > > > > height per > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> renderer in all lists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I think there's no other way to > do > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> If not, other options is to > avoid > > DG > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > "variableRowHeight" > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > force > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> people to use "rowHeight". > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I don't remember what Flex allow > > to > > > do > > > > > > here, > > > > > > > > > but maybe > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> discuss a bit to see what could > be > > > the > > > > > > best > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > Royale > > > > > > > > > > > Jewel > > > > > > > > > > > > > DataGrid. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> El vie., 10 abr. 2020 a las > 15:45, > > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > Zarzycki (< > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Hi Carlos, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > We have switched in our > > > application > > > > to > > > > > > > > > DataGrid. > > > > > > > > > > > There are > > > > > > > > > > > > > unfortunately > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > some custom adjustment to have > > it > > > > > > properly > > > > > > > > > working, > > > > > > > > > > > but we > > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > > move > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> forward > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > with that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > However I have found something > > > > which I > > > > > > > > believe > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > fixed > > > > > > > > > > > > > sooner > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> than > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > When rowHeight is not set and > > > there > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > amount of > > > > > > > > > > > > data > > > > > > > > > > > > > in data > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > grid cells rows are being cut > > and > > > > data > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > displaying > > > > > > > > > > > > fully. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > pushed to TourDeJewel example > > > which > > > > > > shows > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609623612&sdata=kKWcwxHbBUFbNqIn6cbOe4PzzIJ7ZXHi%2BaDGA8pAHOY%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=iDtaQK5fHFY6flba5jUruY2JHsnIH%2Fjach3RozTxN%2B4%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609633601&sdata=SrEazJzdmJ6KYFuZRDRBmt0Uk7%2BF8ZixRu5db2ol%2B00%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609643604&sdata=GQpRF%2F%2FMYdF7v08zgb1Kjvlf7zUFmLAuWDaVp9fe0eE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cadb613d3469b4e4ff5a908d7ee68e25e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637240006609643604&sdata=GQpRF%2F%2FMYdF7v08zgb1Kjvlf7zUFmLAuWDaVp9fe0eE%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Carlos Rovira Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira
