I may be wrong but:
Express appears before Jewel ?
Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we would
not have any other option but this is not the case today and with Jewel
that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone.
However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps it's
a good choice (at least and option).

Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, 21/10/2020
à(s) 09:19:

> Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better explanation and
> wording than me
> thanks
>
> El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (<[email protected]
> >)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you Carlos.
> > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing this 2
> > options as you said.
> >
> > Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta,
> 21/10/2020
> > à(s) 08:56:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the sets
> > Hugo
> > > is asking for:
> > >
> > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath but
> > provide
> > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want div,
> > header,
> > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be mixed
> > with
> > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is using
> HTML
> > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the
> original
> > > app.
> > >
> > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about PAYG
> and
> > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most needed
> > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a component is
> > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in Express
> > have
> > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to add
> it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (<[email protected]
> >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi:
> > > >
> > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here:
> > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current components
> > set
> > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects:
> > > > > - HTML5
> > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core
> > components
> > > > > from the framework
> > > > > - Express
> > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus of
> design
> > > > with
> > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake
> > projects)
> > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX components
> > > (excelent
> > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on design)
> > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark
> components
> > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on
> > > design)
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and HTML5
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > Hugo.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Andrew Wetmore
> > > >
> > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>

Reply via email to