More than that, I think each directory should have a README file that explains the goal or intended use of that component set.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:46 AM Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should list the component sets that are not complete in a > separate list below the mention of Basic and Jewel...and MDL? > > I can get to that later today. > > Andrew > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 5:57 AM Hugo Ferreira <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thank you again. >> It is all clear for me now :) >> >> Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, >> 21/10/2020 >> à(s) 09:54: >> >> > I think Express was a good idea some years ago, but was not developed, >> so >> > maybe the problem is that it didn't go so far, but maybe others want to >> > develop that one. >> > In the other hand we have other UI sets that was just experiments like >> > CreateJS or Flat, I think those could be removed or something (at least >> > from the SDK or from building) since don't think will go further >> > >> > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:25, Hugo Ferreira (< >> [email protected] >> > >) >> > escribió: >> > >> > > I may be wrong but: >> > > Express appears before Jewel ? >> > > Seems natural to me to pick up Express if I want to started and we >> would >> > > not have any other option but this is not the case today and with >> Jewel >> > > that evolved a lot, seems that Express end up alone. >> > > However if for some reason, someone want to create is own set perhaps >> > it's >> > > a good choice (at least and option). >> > > >> > > Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, >> > 21/10/2020 >> > > à(s) 09:19: >> > > >> > > > Hope Andrew can add the missing description with a better >> explanation >> > and >> > > > wording than me >> > > > thanks >> > > > >> > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 10:05, Hugo Ferreira (< >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >) >> > > > escribió: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > Thank you Carlos. >> > > > > In fact in saw the referenced page and asked because was missing >> > this 2 >> > > > > options as you said. >> > > > > >> > > > > Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, >> > > > 21/10/2020 >> > > > > à(s) 08:56: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi >> > > > > > >> > > > > > we need to update that page since it doesn't give info about the >> > sets >> > > > > Hugo >> > > > > > is asking for: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - HTML and HTML5: Are the components that use Basic underneath >> but >> > > > > provide >> > > > > > basic HTML(or HTML5) component tags. For example, if you want >> div, >> > > > > header, >> > > > > > section, button tags from HTML you must use this. This could be >> > mixed >> > > > > with >> > > > > > other sets like Basic or Jewel. In fact you can see TodoMVC is >> > using >> > > > HTML >> > > > > > components along Jewel components to mimic the interface in the >> > > > original >> > > > > > app. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - Express: Is Basic with beads applied. While Basic is all about >> > PAYG >> > > > and >> > > > > > the foundation of other sets, Express uses to configure the most >> > > needed >> > > > > > beads so is not PAYG. For example if enabling/disable a >> component >> > is >> > > > > > something we think it could be very needed, the components in >> > Express >> > > > > have >> > > > > > the Disabled bead attached by default while in Basic you need to >> > add >> > > > it. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > El mié., 21 oct. 2020 a las 2:43, Andrew Wetmore (< >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >) >> > > > > > escribió: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Brief descriptions of the component set are here: >> > > > > > > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Andrew >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:20 PM Hugo Ferreira < >> > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > For a while that I have a question to make about current >> > > components >> > > > > set >> > > > > > > :) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > If search for TextInput.as, I found the following projects: >> > > > > > > > - HTML5 >> > > > > > > > - Basic: I know that this is the smallest and 100% PAYG core >> > > > > components >> > > > > > > > from the framework >> > > > > > > > - Express >> > > > > > > > - Jewel: I know that this extends from Basic and it's focus >> of >> > > > design >> > > > > > > with >> > > > > > > > TDJ samples (excelent choice for new project and Flex remake >> > > > > projects) >> > > > > > > > - MXRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for MX >> components >> > > > > > (excelent >> > > > > > > > choice to port from Flex with less time and no focus on >> design) >> > > > > > > > - SparkRoyale: I know that this is the emulation for Spark >> > > > components >> > > > > > > > (excelent choice to port from Flex with less time and no >> focus >> > on >> > > > > > design) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I don't know what the purpose of Express components set and >> > HTML5 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thank you, >> > > > > > > > Hugo. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Andrew Wetmore >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Carlos Rovira >> > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC >> > > > > > *Apache Software Foundation* >> > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Carlos Rovira >> > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC >> > > > *Apache Software Foundation* >> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Rovira >> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC >> > *Apache Software Foundation* >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira >> > >> > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- Andrew Wetmore http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
