I can understand generating the SWF target for the xJS.swc (JS) build. The SWF targets are fairly quick.
I'm mostly hoping there's a way to avoid building the JS target for the x.swc (SWF) build. The JS targets take much, much longer for my machine, at least*. So eliminating half of those would speed up my build tremendously. * = Machine is definitely IOPS-bound, but perhaps just general slowness. On 11/29/2020 3:18 AM, Harbs wrote: > I remember having this discussion before and the reason was nuanced enough > that I don’t remember. The SWCs are not the same, but I don’t remember > exactly the difference. > > JS SWCs always require a SWF target because that generates the actual SWC > which the JS files are then added to. It would be great to be able to avoid > that piece, but that’s not something that we’ve done yet. > >> On Nov 29, 2020, at 10:58 AM, Edward Stangler wrote: >> >> BTW, why are both SWF and JS targets being built for both x.swc and >> xJS.swc? Seems like double the compile time (both x and xJS get built >> at the same time, anyway).
