Let’s wait and see whether we are dealing with real issues or not. If it’s an issue we can debate solutions.
I’m happy to ask my Adobe contacts what the plan is. > On Jan 3, 2021, at 8:52 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > the problem here's that I think we are on Apache, and using a piece of > software that is under a clear license use will be against the foundation > rules. So although you or I can host the files, that's not seem to me like > a solution to the real problem. > > I'm for go step by step and first try to talk with Adobe representatives to > get the permission for Apache to host the player files only for our flex > and royale use cases. I think we could continue discussion after we know > the solution to this request > > Can you, Alex or others do this request? or if you want I can do it, but > need someone to provide me the contact at adobe. > > Thanks > > > > El dom, 3 ene 2021 a las 15:59, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> There’s no license agreement when downloading playerglobal or the content >> debugger. >> >> I’m willing to take the risk to personally host these files if necessary. >> >>> On Jan 3, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> And I doubt we would be allowed to simply upload Adobe stuff to any >> other server wirhout explicit conset from them. The license agreement you >> agreed to when downloading explicitly forbids that (at least it did, wenn >> we were working on the Flex Mavenizer and I doubt things changed) >> >> > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC > *Apache Software Foundation* > http://about.me/carlosrovira
