Hi Piotr, SNAPSHOT stuff is never downloaded from Maven central. Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff from the Apache Maven repo.
BUT ... we only deploy snapshots for stuff on develop. Otherwise, the versions of feature branches would keep on overwriting the develop artifacts and we would have a non-deterministic behavior. So ... if we merged my changes in compiler and typedefs to develop, then the artifacts would be available in Apache's maven repo, otherwise you have to build them yourself. So, assuming my changes were merged to develop, then you could do it as you describe. Hope that explains things. Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:30 An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned Chris, I'm reporting you how I used to create distribution and how I expected to be working. If I remember correctly If I run my command pom from distribution should take care of compiler/royale version - if the freshest stuff doesn't exists locally it should download from Maven central - where is the problem ? What has been changed that this doesn't work like that anymore ? In general preparing distribution should take max 5 minutes - I don't have to build whole framework at all. Thanks, Piotr śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:53 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > Well, that's something completely different. So, you want to create a > distribution from what was already released? > That's not how the maven-assembly-plugin works. You can't think of the > distribution as some tooling you can apply to something else. > It's more a facet of the current build. > > Theoretically you should be able to do that if we also had a " > royale.framework.version" property and would use that in the distribution. > Then you could override the 4 properties: > > <royale.build-tools.version>1.2.1</royale.build-tools.version> > <royale.compiler.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.compiler.version> > <royale.typedefs.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.typedefs.version> > <royale.framework.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale. > framework.version> > > But even that wouldn't work as we would still be missing 2 artifacts > for the older versions. > (I now zip up the shell scripts of the compiler module as one artifact > and the ACE typedef as a second artifact) > > If the distribution built from the current state works, we can start > shipping Maven-built distributions starting now, but not for earlier > versions. > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 14:36 > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > Chris, > > What you are showing me is running and building SDK with distribution > - that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole SDK or > I would like to based my distribution on what I have in maven central > - I should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ and run > command: > > mvn clean compile > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > > I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare distribution. > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > You are running in what directory ? > > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > napisał(a): > > > >> So I'm running: > >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > >> with-distribution,option-with-swf > >> > >> And It's working nicely .. same as > >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > >> with-distribution > >> > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59 > >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > >> > >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I have > >> empty folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 seconds, which > >> definitely is not good: > >> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT: > >> [INFO] > >> [INFO] compc .............................................. SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 8.952 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-asc ....................................... SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.559 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-compc ..................................... SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.567 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ................................... SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.284 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc ..................................... SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.347 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ................................... SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.683 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer ................................. SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.675 s] > >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ................................... SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.295 s] > >> [INFO] mxmlc .............................................. SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 1.305 s] > >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................ SUCCESS > >> [ > >> 14.948 s] > >> [INFO] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- > >> --- > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > >> [INFO] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- > >> --- > >> [INFO] Total time: 36.807 s > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- > >> --- > >> > >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution> > >> > >> I'm not sure what is happening. > >> > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >> > Hi Piotr, > >> > > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was something that > >> > changed in Maven ... > >> > What you did should work and be all you need. > >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch and > >> > run a mvn install on them as they need one new artifact from > >> > compiler and one new artifact from typedefs. > >> > > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09 > >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > aligned > >> > > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate > >> > distribution now using Maven ? I did that previously by: > >> > > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile > >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution\ > >> > > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz > >> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > napisał(a): > >> > > >> > > Ok ... > >> > > > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my "branch" > >> > > - Mainly because I don't have a ranch. > >> > > > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would be cool > >> > > if you folks could mass-test it. > >> > > > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09 > >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > aligned > >> > > > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc, > >> > > > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef really > >> > > feels a bit random. > >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for today. > >> > > > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >> > > > >> > > ________________________________ > >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM > >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > aligned > >> > > > >> > > No, > >> > > > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and build > >> > > all of them, cause it produces one more artifact in compiler > >> > > and in the > >> typedef. > >> > > > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >> > > > >> > > ________________________________ > >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM > >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > aligned > >> > > > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects > >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be a > >> > > valid .swc file. So, the person who set that up probably just > >> > > copied one of the > >> > existing .swc files. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Josh, > >> > > > > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them ... I > >> > > > just didn't want to add stuff we don't need. > >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - I'll add > >> > > > them > >> > > > ;-) > >> > > > > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says: > >> > > > > >> > > > <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder appear > >> > > > like a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder --> > >> > > > > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, so I now > >> > > > just added these. > >> > > > > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort of > >> > > > seems pretty strange ... can anyone explain what it's required for? > >> > > > > >> > > > <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc" > >> > > > tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc" > >> > > > /> > >> > > > > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a > >> > > > location the FlashBuilder might be looking for. > >> > > > > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors to > >> > > > have a "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we could one > >> > > > day simply > >> > remove. > >> > > > > >> > > > Chris > >> > > > > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47 > >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > > aligned > >> > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser > >> > > > > and winfonts.ser > >> > > > files are needed for? > >> > > > > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would assume > >> > > > that Flash Builder expects those files to exist, but if the > >> > > > Flash Builder integration document doesn't mention them, then > >> > > > I don't > >> know. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Josh, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config files > >> > > > > used in the Maven distribution should now match the file > >> > > > > names in the > >> > > distribution. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser > >> > > > > and winfonts.ser files are needed for? They are simply > >> > > > > completely empty filed the Ant build createates via "touch" > >> > > > > commant. I could add them to the Maven distribution, but > >> > > > > only want to add stuff > >> > that's needed. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the new > >> distribution. > >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there and in > >> > > > > the same location as with the Ant build, but I left away > >> > > > > things I tought are probably not required in the > >> > > > > distribution and are results of simply packing the entire project > >> > > > > up. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it worked > >> > > > > with all of them (Haven't tried all of them though) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me some > >> > > > > feedback on > >> > it. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35 > >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >> > > > > aligned > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE > >> > > > > experience while developing a Royale app. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src > >> > > > > > directories of all modules in the "projects" directory to > >> > > > > > allow the > >> code-insights? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the essential parts > >> > > > > > of the > >> > > "asjs" > >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system included. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18 > >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never completely > >> > > > > > understood the typedef stuff ;) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the names of > >> > > > > > the typedef libraries in all of these 2 (Well actually > >> > > > > > probably just > >> > > > > > 2) > >> > > > > > - external-library-path > >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling it a > >> > > > > > day and signing off for today. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you folks > >> > > > > > want to check what I'm doing ... now you have something > >> > > > > > to look at > >> > > > > > :.) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13 > >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >> > > > options: > >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path and > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both JS and > >> > > > > > SWF targets, but you can use js-external-library-path or > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path to override the > >> > > > > > external-library-path for a > >> > > > specific target. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is defined: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and > >> > > > > > it will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > If both js-external-library-path and > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are > >> > > > > > defined: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and it > >> > > > > > will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path, and > >> > > > > > it will ignore external-library-path > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and > >> > > > > > royale-config.xml configs are all expected to be used for > >> > > > > > both JS and SWF > targets. > >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so we're > >> > > > > > using js-external-library-path to override which > >> > > > > > libraries are used for the JS target. The SWF target will > >> > > > > > use > >> external-library-path. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are expected > >> > > > > > to be used with JS only. Basically, these ones can use > >> > > > > > external-library-path directly because they don't need to > >> > > > > > target SWF. If we wanted, we could change them to use > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path instead, and they should > >> > > > > still work. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use js-external-library-path > >> > > > > > and swf-external-library-path, and never use > external-library-path. > >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy reason > >> > > > > > (like Flash Builder support) for why we defaulted to > >> > > > > > playerglobal.swc on the external-library-path for the SWF > >> > > > > > target instead of using swf-external-library-path. I > >> > > > > > think that js-external-library-path or > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path were introduced before I > >> > > > > > started working on > >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are some > >> > > > > > > inconsistencies in the config files and I'm currently > >> > > > > > > not quite sure to which is the correct > >> > > > > > > version: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: > >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: > >> > > > > > > external-library-path > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > In: > >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml > >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called: > >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version defined as > >> > > > > > > properties in all configs except: > >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the > >> > > > > > > asdoc-config.xml the same way as all the others. > >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just thought > >> > > > > > > I'd point it > >> > > > > out. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29 > >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build is doing > >> > > > > > > too, so I think you are correct. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they sort > >> > > > > > > > of were creatd shortly after the big-bang ;-) ... > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from each by: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing the > >> > > > > > > > swfversion > >> 3. > >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf > >> > > > > > > > distribution filtering out the references to > >> > > > > > > > playerglobal > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only including > >> > > > > > > > the output in the distribution and not the templates, > >> > > > > > > > as I assume they are not > >> > > > > > needed. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46 > >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files have > >> > > > > > > > existed since the Flex days. The "create-config" task > >> > > > > > > > in frameworks/build.xml replaces certain tokens in > >> > > > > > > > the template based on the Ant build's current > >> > > > > > > configuration. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include all of > >> > > > > > > > the Ant build.xml files to allow users to manually > >> > > > > > > > rebuild the framework with local changes. If this > >> > > > > > > > still holds true, then the config templates are > >> > > > > > > probably required. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer Dutz > >> > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ... they > >> > > > > > > > > always were in the frameworks dir ... I think the > >> > > > > > > > > ANT build takes the templates and inserts variables > >> > > > > > > > > to generate the real > >> > > versions. > >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same with > >> > > > > > > > > maven > >> ... > >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty out of sync. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template" files > >> > > > > > > > > need to be in the distribution? Are they needed for > anything? > >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53 > >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > >> > > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > >> > > > > > > > > and Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions: > >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log of tupples: > >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml: Where > >> > > > > > > > > > does the xyz-config.xml get generated from the > >> > > > > > > > > > template in the ANT > >> > > > build? > >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the templates as > >> > > > > > > > > > part of the > >> > > > > > > build)... > >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It seems > >> > > > > > > > > > as if they are only needed to generate the > >> > > > > > > > > > configs for a given set of configured properties. > >> > > > > > > > > > If that's the case, we don't need them in the > >> > > > > > > distribution. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by you > >> > > > > > > > > when you created the maven build for Royale. So if > >> > > > > > > > > you think you can remove templates, I think it > >> > > > > > > > > would be good to reduce files if they are not > >> > > > > > used at all. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml was > >> > > > > > > > > > named > >> > > > > > "roayale-config" > >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and "flex-config" in > >> > > > > > > > > > the Ant distribution and it contained a reference > >> > > > > > > > > > to the mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also did the Ant > >> > > > > > > > > > version contain a lot more implicit imports as > >> > > > > > > > > > well as a fxg-base-class element > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing with > >> > > > > > > > > fx:Array > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated the > >> > > > > > > > > > distribution in the "features/distribution-allignment" > >> > branch. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Great! > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and try to > >> > > > > > > > > > get the maven distribution to have the same > >> > > > > > > > > > directory structure as the Ant one (but excluding > >> > > > > > > > > > all the > >> unnecessary stuff). > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and I'll > >> > > > > > > > > do a > >> try. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this! > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28 > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > >> > > > > > > > > > and Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ... > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in "compiler-externc" > >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are identical ... > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm a bit > >> > > > > > > > > > rusty regarding how all of these externs and > >> > > > > > > > > > stuff work > >> > > > > > > > > > together) > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml lists the > >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both the non-swf as > >> > > > > > > > > > well as the with-swf > >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that to the > >> > > > > > > > > > configuration > >> > > > > > > > changes anything. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08 > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >> > > > > > > > > > Maven aligned > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link: > >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuild > >> > > > > > > > > > er > >> > > > > > > > > > .tx > >> > > > > > > > > > t > >> > > > > > > > > > at master > >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)< > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/master/id > >> > > > > > > > > > e/ > >> > > > > > > > > > fla > >> > > > > > > > > > sh > >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME > >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a > >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml > >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it (we > >> > > > > > > > > > don't have the entire > >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this? > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as expected. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things that > >> > > > > > > > > > could be > >> > wrong. > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira > >> > > > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software > >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
