I've confirmed that, in the stage-sources target in the Ant build script, we're forcing the correct line ending variation for all files in bin and js/bin. CRLF for the .bat files, and LF for the Unix shell scripts.
https://paste.apache.org/ftuwy With that in mind, it shouldn't matter how the files are checked out because our build should force them to the right line endings regardless. I wonder what's causing this to fail... -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:04 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > I thought that I remembered that the Ant build forces line endings when > copying the bin files to avoid this issue. Maybe some are incorrectly being > excluded. Or maybe it's happening only to bin and not to js/bin? > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:07 AM Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I believe I have found the reason. In our Apache Jenkins machine git >> checkout file and changes it's original line endings. If file was LF on >> our >> server is CRLF. Checkout any file from our workspace [1] >> >> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Royale/job/Royale-asjs/ws/js/bin/ >> >> śr., 22 wrz 2021 o 12:26 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> napisał(a): >> >> > Before I go farther into that rabbit hole - anyone have some idea why >> this >> > is happening ? >> > >> > śr., 15 wrz 2021 o 11:11 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > napisał(a): >> > >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> >> >> I have reported problem with mxmlc during release process. It looks >> like >> >> Royale distribution build by Ant on Jenkins have different line endings >> >> than that downloaded from nightlies website. >> >> >> >> My Atom text editor shows: >> >> 1) Royale downloaded from here [1] on file js/bin/mxmlc have line >> endings >> >> LF >> >> 2) Royale downloaded from here [2] on file js/bin/mxmlc have line >> endings >> >> CRLF >> >> >> >> Anyone know how to fix this ? >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ >> >> [2] https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/ >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> >> Od: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >> Date: wt., 11 maj 2021 o 17:54 >> >> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >> To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Yishay, >> >> >> >> I have downloaded Nightly 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT build prepared by Maven from >> >> here [1]. When I'm trying build our application on Mac OSX I'm getting >> >> following error: >> >> >> >> : /bin/bash: >> >> >> /Users/piotr/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT/js/bin/mxmlc: >> >> /bin/sh^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory >> >> >> >> I cannot test whether Ant version of Nightly is not working as well >> cause >> >> it is still failing :( [2] - It would be good if you don't have time to >> >> continue on release just tried to fix build and leave it in a state >> where >> >> it's working correctly. >> >> >> >> Under link [1] there is also old build with 0.9.8, so I downloaded it >> >> and replace mxmlc file in folder /apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT/js/bin/ >> - >> >> Build of my application started work. >> >> >> >> I downloaded 0.9.9 build on my Windows machine and build same project - >> >> everything works fine - it means that mxmlc.bat is untouched. >> >> >> >> Is it possible that for some reason during commits, merge and changes >> git >> >> change line endings in mxmlc - mac version of file ? >> >> >> >> [1] https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/ >> >> [2] >> >> >> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/ >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> pt., 7 maj 2021 o 19:19 Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> >> napisał(a): >> >> >> >>> Great, thanks all for the prompt help. Most appreciated! >> >>> >> >>> Now, if I can only wrap my head around mysterious binding failures, or >> >>> how to debug them, I'd be set. >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:17 AM >> >>> To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> >> >>> That is my understanding as well. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Josh Tynjala >> >>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 10:01 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > IIRC, royale-config.xml does not include the MXRoyale swc but >> >>> > flex-config.xml does. >> >>> > >> >>> > HTH, >> >>> > -Alex >> >>> > >> >>> > On 5/7/21, 9:30 AM, "Brian Raymes" <brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > Okay, that worked. Thank you! >> >>> > >> >>> > Was this changed somewhat recently? I haven't needed this >> >>> > js-library-path before. >> >>> > >> >>> > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:20 AM >> >>> > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > >> >>> > I think that you need to manually add MXRoyaleJS.swc (and >> >>> > MXRoyale.swc if you are targeting SWF too) to your compiler options >> in >> >>> > asconfig.json, just like in this example: >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith >> >>> > ub.com >> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fexamples%2Fmxroyale%2 >> >>> > >> FRemoteObjectAMFTest%2Fasconfig.json&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe >> >>> > >> .com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de >> >>> > >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4w >> >>> > >> LjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdat >> >>> > a=7n3lX8iIPiag7%2BsSVRno9J1EANwNNwbabv4352E8izw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > >> >>> > The MX classes are not included automatically in the default >> >>> "royale" >> >>> > config, and you need to opt into using them. >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Josh Tynjala >> >>> > Bowler Hat LLC < >> >>> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C35efef06af8648019 >> >>> > >> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018 >> >>> > >> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi >> >>> > >> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7 >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:05 AM Brian Raymes < >> >>> brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > > Here is my asconfig.json file. Perhaps I'm missing how this is >> >>> used. >> >>> > I >> >>> > > don't use this to compile, but it's necessary for source >> >>> completion, >> >>> > > etc. I would imagine this can even be smaller in the cases >> where >> >>> > Maven is used? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > { >> >>> > > "config": "royale", >> >>> > > "type": "app", >> >>> > > "compilerOptions": { >> >>> > > "debug": true, >> >>> > > "targets": [ >> >>> > > "JSRoyale" >> >>> > > ], >> >>> > > "source-map": true, >> >>> > > "source-path": [ >> >>> > > "src/main/royale" >> >>> > > ] >> >>> > > }, >> >>> > > "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars >> >>> > > -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions >> >>> > > -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true >> >>> -js-default-initializers=true >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> -keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,PostConstruct,PreDe >> >>> > > >> -keep-as3-metadata+stroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient >> >>> > > -keep-code-with-metadata=Inject", >> >>> > > "files": [ >> >>> > > "src/main/royale/App.mxml" >> >>> > > ], >> >>> > > "mainClass": "App" >> >>> > > } >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> > > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 8:44 AM >> >>> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > > >> >>> > > What does your asconfig.json file look like? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -- >> >>> > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> > > Bowler Hat LLC < >> >>> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C35efef06af8648019 >> >>> > >> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018 >> >>> > >> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi >> >>> > >> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7 >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes < >> >>> > brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> >>> > > wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > I can compile just fine with Maven, , and have never needed >> to >> >>> do >> >>> > > > anything like that in the past. It's VSCode that is >> >>> > complaining that >> >>> > > > these imports do not exist. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Assuming the new royale-sdk I built is missing something? >> Or my >> >>> > > > asconfig may need to be adjusted for the new sdk changes? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > I followed what Josh explained below, removed >> >>> > > > "-DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path) option" >> and >> >>> > > > replaced my previously built royale-sdk with the one from a >> >>> > fresh >> >>> > build: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > royale-asjs\distribution\target\apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Simply unzipped the above and replace my previous. After >> doing >> >>> so, >> >>> > > > all mx imports are reporting as missing (squiggly >> underlines). >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > > > From: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:59 PM >> >>> > > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> > > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > I wonder if you mean the automatic imports.... >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > with maven I often have something like this: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > -compiler.mxml.imports= >> >>> > > > mx.resources.ResourceManager, >> >>> > > > org.apache.royale.events.Event, >> >>> > > > org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher, >> >>> > > > org.apache.royale.events.IEventDispatcher, >> >>> > > > mx.events.MouseEvent, >> >>> > > > mx.events.FocusEvent, >> >>> > > > mx.events.KeyboardEvent, >> >>> > > > org.apache.royale.geom.*, >> >>> > > > org.apache.royale.core.ClassFactory, >> >>> > > > org.apache.royale.core.IFactory; >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > In the <additionalCompilerOptions> nested section of the >> royale >> >>> > > > compiler <configuration> tag >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Is it more that, do you think, or more that you are actually >> >>> > missing >> >>> > > > the MXRoyale dependency? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:49 PM Brian Raymes >> >>> > > > <brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> >>> > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > I should have mentioned, I use Maven to compile. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > > > > From: Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> >>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:32 PM >> >>> > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org >> >>> > > > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Hi Josh, >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > I've done what you've said, and I can now build >> successfully, >> >>> > > > > thank >> >>> > > you. >> >>> > > > > But.. Now, all MX imports cannot be found in my project. I >> >>> rely >> >>> > > > > heavily on AMF with my current project, and now my project >> >>> > within >> >>> > > > > VSCode is showing hundreds of errors, but can compile >> >>> > successfully. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > What could I be missing? I compared the previously built >> SDK >> >>> > with >> >>> > > > > the new, and they are definitely structured differently. >> The >> >>> MX >> >>> > > > > SWCs are found within the new. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Thoughts? >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Brian >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > > > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 9:11 AM >> >>> > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> > > > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Unfortunately, Adobe no longer provides AIR SDK 20.0. The >> >>> only >> >>> > > > > version they still offer is AIR 32.0. On macOS, I believe >> >>> > AIR >> >>> > 32.0 >> >>> > > > > is also only downloadable in a .dmg format that the Maven >> >>> plugin >> >>> > > > > doesn't know how to process, which makes things even >> harder. >> >>> > Older >> >>> > > > > versions of the macOS AIR SDK used to be available in a >> >>> > different >> >>> > > > > format, like .tbz2 or .tar.gz or something like that, but >> >>> Adobe >> >>> > > > > changed to .dmg only at some point. Anyway, this is why >> >>> building >> >>> > > > > the >> >>> > > distribution is failing. >> >>> > > > > Those who can still build are lucky enough to have it in >> >>> their >> >>> > > > > cache from before Adobe removed all of the files from the >> >>> > servers. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > But, there's hope! If you build the distribution without >> >>> > > > > specifying a target folder, it won't try to include Adobe >> >>> > > > > artifacts. It's only when you build to a folder that the >> AIR >> >>> SDK >> >>> > > > > is used in the build >> >>> > > process. >> >>> > > > > When you don't specify a target folder, the distribution >> >>> will go >> >>> > > > > into a zip or tar.gz file instead. When the build >> completes, >> >>> you >> >>> > > > > can just extract that into a folder, and it's basically >> the >> >>> > same thing. >> >>> > > > > If you need playerglobal.swc and the AIR SDK, you can >> merge >> >>> them >> >>> > > > > manually (like we used to do with the Adobe Flex SDK >> before >> >>> the >> >>> > > > > Apache >> >>> > > installer). >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Basically, in your distribution build command, just remove >> >>> the >> >>> > > > > -DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path) option, >> and >> >>> it >> >>> > > > > should work without the AIR SDK. I don't know whether >> there >> >>> are >> >>> > > > > other issues on the develop branch that might also cause >> the >> >>> > Maven >> >>> > > > > distribution build to fail, but this is how you deal with >> >>> > the AIR >> >>> > > > > SDK >> >>> > > part at least. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > -- >> >>> > > > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC < >> >>> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C35efef06af8648019 >> >>> > >> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018 >> >>> > >> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi >> >>> > >> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7 >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes >> >>> > > > > <brian.ray...@teotech.com> >> >>> > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > +1 for fixing current state of repo. >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > I haven't been able to successfully build with Maven for >> >>> > quite a >> >>> > > > > > long while now due to what looks to be shifts with this >> >>> > release. >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > For one, it seems to repeat ask to install the AIR SDK, >> but >> >>> > > > > > fails to notify something, then fails to download as >> they >> >>> > can't be found. >> >>> > > > > > This happens about 20 times. >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Example: >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > [INFO] - Installing Adobe AIR SDK 20.0 Your System-Id: >> >>> > ........... >> >>> > > > > > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR >> >>> SDK. >> >>> > Do >> >>> > > > > > you want to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK >> >>> License: >> >>> > > > > > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html >> >>> > > > > > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, >> >>> > > > > > alternatively to typing y or yes you can also set a >> system >> >>> > > > > > property containing your system which is interpreted as >> >>> > > > > > equivalent to accepting by typing y or >> >>> > > > > yes: >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> >> -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=........... >> >>> > > > > > ) >> >>> > > > > > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Yes >> >>> > > > > > [WARNING] Failed to notify spy >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > org.apache.flex.utilities.converter.mavenextension.FlexEventSpy: >> >>> > > > > > Caught exception while downloading and converting >> artifact. >> >>> > > > > > [INFO] Couldn't find artifact: >> >>> com.adobe.air:20.0:runtime:pom >> >>> > > > > > [INFO] >> >>> > > > > > >> =========================================================== >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Then, it fails to build the distribution because of a >> >>> > > > > > potentially all of these unresolved artifacts for >> >>> > 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT. >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> >>> > > > > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:33 AM >> >>> > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Hi Yishay, >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Where are you with release now ? Build is failing on >> Maven >> >>> > sight >> >>> > > > > > for several days, cause it was switched to 0.9.9. Are >> you >> >>> > going >> >>> > > > > > to make another attempt this week ? >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Thanks, >> >>> > > > > > Piotr >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > niedz., 21 mar 2021 o 11:00 Harbs < >> harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > napisał(a): >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > I think what I started was reverted. >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Thanks for picking up the slack for me… >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Let me know if you need help from me. >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Harbs >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Yishay Weiss >> >>> > > > > > > > <yishayj...@hotmail.com> >> >>> > > > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Hi, >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > I'd like to start a release again, maybe Harbs will >> >>> pick >> >>> > > > > > > > this up later >> >>> > > > > > > when he's less loaded, so if anyone wants to update >> the >> >>> > > > > > > release notes this might be a good time. >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > I'd like to start afresh, so Harbs, let me know if >> >>> > there are >> >>> > > > > > > > RCs for >> >>> > > > > > > Royale or for compiler-build-tools that need >> cancelling. >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Thanks >> >>> > > > > > > > ________________________________ >> >>> > > > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >>> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:51 PM >> >>> > > > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development < >> dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: about releasing 0.9.8 >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Hi! just finished my list of updates for 0.9.8 >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > Others are welcome to add to it for upcoming >> release! >> >>> :) >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > El mar., 17 nov. 2020 a las 20:07, Josh Tynjala (< >> >>> > > > > > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>) >> >>> > > > > > > > escribió: >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> I just updated the RELEASE_NOTES.md files in both >> >>> > > > > > > >> royale-compiler and royale-asjs with my changes for >> >>> the >> >>> > > > > > > >> 0.9.8 release. Everyone should also >> >>> > > > > > > add >> >>> > > > > > > >> their own changes to these files. >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> -- >> >>> > > > > > > >> Josh Tynjala >> >>> > > > > > > >> Bowler Hat LLC < >> >>> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C35efef06af8648019 >> >>> > >> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018 >> >>> > >> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi >> >>> > >> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7 >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:25 AM Carlos Rovira >> >>> > > > > > > >> <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >>> > > > > > > >> wrote: >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> Thanks Harbs! >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> @Andrew I think we should all try to add to the >> list >> >>> of >> >>> > > > > > > >>> new features, >> >>> > > > > > > >> fixes >> >>> > > > > > > >>> and more. If you could prepare different place >> >>> > holders for >> >>> > > > > > > >>> compiler-typedefs-asjs, we can all try to fill it >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> thanks >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> El lun., 16 nov. 2020 a las 19:47, Andrew Wetmore >> (< >> >>> > > > > > > cottag...@gmail.com >> >>> > > > > > > >>> ) >> >>> > > > > > > >>> escribió: >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> Is there a list of new features and fixes since >> >>> 0.9.7? >> >>> > I >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> would like to >> >>> > > > > > > >>> see >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> if i can at least get good documentation in place >> >>> about >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> those >> >>> > > > > > changes. >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> a >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:23 PM Harbs >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> <harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> OK. I’ll start tomorrow. >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> (fingers crossed) >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Nov 16, 2020, at 5:55 PM, Carlos Rovira < >> >>> > > > > > > >> carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Hi, >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> I think the time zone problems Chris warned are >> >>> now >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> behind us, and >> >>> > > > > > > >>> want >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> to >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> open this thread about releasing 0.9.8. Many >> >>> months >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> have passed >> >>> > > > > > > >> and I >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> think >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> we need to push a new release soon, I think >> >>> > before the >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> end of the >> >>> > > > > > > >>> year >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> will >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> be the best for us if possible. >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> What do you think? Harbs can we count on you to >> >>> > do the task? >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks in advance >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> -- >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache >> Software >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Foundation* >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Jv7ToVc%2FryLL1epbcgxgIBfb0mvGu%2BWnGT4vmaxTMck%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> -- >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> Andrew Wetmore >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=wh%2FMsvDEhp2%2FxWCpfBXaJIDEIdKNTb9RuY3Btn3i8Lg%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > > > > > >>>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >>> -- >> >>> > > > > > > >>> Carlos Rovira >> >>> > > > > > > >>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software >> >>> > > > > > > >>> Foundation* >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057293410%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=wGrBNB7Ul%2BEV%2FJiHqIrZW21drinZdmJJFhAej15LQks%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > > > > > >>> >> >>> > > > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > -- >> >>> > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira >> >>> > > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache Software >> >>> > > > > > > > Foundation* >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057293410%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=wGrBNB7Ul%2BEV%2FJiHqIrZW21drinZdmJJFhAej15LQks%3D&reserved=0 >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > -- >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >
