It looks like the latest Maven nightly now has the correct line endings.
Please confirm!

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>


On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:39 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:

> Okay, I've found where these files are copied into the distribution in
> component-royale.xml, and I think I can figure out how to tweak it to
> change line endings. I'll take care of this.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:24 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> wrote:
>
>> Understood. Thanks for clearing that up. It looks like the Maven Assembly
>> Plugin allows you to specify line endings for file sets, so I think it will
>> be possible to tweak the Maven build to force line endings too.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:16 AM Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep Ant may force that, but I'm talking here about Maven build who is
>>> creating distribution [1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Royale/job/Royale-asjs/
>>>
>>> śr., 22 wrz 2021 o 18:12 Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>> > I've confirmed that, in the stage-sources target in the Ant build
>>> script,
>>> > we're forcing the correct line ending variation for all files in bin
>>> and
>>> > js/bin. CRLF for the .bat files, and LF for the Unix shell scripts.
>>> >
>>> > https://paste.apache.org/ftuwy
>>> >
>>> > With that in mind, it shouldn't matter how the files are checked out
>>> > because our build should force them to the right line endings
>>> regardless. I
>>> > wonder what's causing this to fail...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Josh Tynjala
>>> > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:04 AM Josh Tynjala <
>>> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I thought that I remembered that the Ant build forces line endings
>>> when
>>> > > copying the bin files to avoid this issue. Maybe some are incorrectly
>>> > being
>>> > > excluded. Or maybe it's happening only to bin and not to js/bin?
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Josh Tynjala
>>> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:07 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I believe I have found the reason. In our Apache Jenkins machine git
>>> > >> checkout file and changes it's original line endings. If file was
>>> LF on
>>> > >> our
>>> > >> server is CRLF. Checkout any file from our workspace [1]
>>> > >>
>>> > >> [1]
>>> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Royale/job/Royale-asjs/ws/js/bin/
>>> > >>
>>> > >> śr., 22 wrz 2021 o 12:26 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> napisał(a):
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Before I go farther into that rabbit hole - anyone have some idea
>>> why
>>> > >> this
>>> > >> > is happening ?
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > śr., 15 wrz 2021 o 11:11 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> > napisał(a):
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >> Hi Guys,
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I have reported problem with mxmlc during release process. It
>>> looks
>>> > >> like
>>> > >> >> Royale distribution build by Ant on Jenkins have different line
>>> > endings
>>> > >> >> than that downloaded from nightlies website.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> My Atom text editor shows:
>>> > >> >> 1) Royale downloaded from here [1] on file js/bin/mxmlc have line
>>> > >> endings
>>> > >> >> LF
>>> > >> >> 2) Royale downloaded from here [2] on file js/bin/mxmlc have line
>>> > >> endings
>>> > >> >> CRLF
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Anyone know how to fix this ?
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> [1]
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
>>> > >> >> [2] https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Thanks,
>>> > >> >> Piotr
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> > >> >> Od: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >> Date: wt., 11 maj 2021 o 17:54
>>> > >> >> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >> To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Hi Yishay,
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I have downloaded Nightly 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT build prepared by Maven
>>> from
>>> > >> >> here [1]. When I'm trying build our application on Mac OSX I'm
>>> > getting
>>> > >> >> following error:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> : /bin/bash:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> /Users/piotr/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT/js/bin/mxmlc:
>>> > >> >> /bin/sh^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I cannot test whether Ant version of Nightly is not working as
>>> well
>>> > >> cause
>>> > >> >> it is still failing :( [2] - It would be good if you don't have
>>> time
>>> > to
>>> > >> >> continue on release just tried to fix build and leave it in a
>>> state
>>> > >> where
>>> > >> >> it's working correctly.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Under link [1] there is also old build with 0.9.8, so I
>>> downloaded it
>>> > >> >> and replace mxmlc file in folder
>>> > /apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT/js/bin/
>>> > >> -
>>> > >> >> Build of my application started work.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> I downloaded 0.9.9 build on my Windows machine and build same
>>> > project -
>>> > >> >> everything works fine - it means that mxmlc.bat is untouched.
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Is it possible that for some reason during commits, merge and
>>> changes
>>> > >> git
>>> > >> >> change line endings in mxmlc - mac version of file ?
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> [1] https://nightlies.apache.org/Royale/Royale-asjs/
>>> > >> >> [2]
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Thanks,
>>> > >> >> Piotr
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> pt., 7 maj 2021 o 19:19 Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
>>> > >> >> napisał(a):
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>> Great, thanks all for the prompt help. Most appreciated!
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> Now, if I can only wrap my head around mysterious binding
>>> failures,
>>> > or
>>> > >> >>> how to debug them, I'd be set.
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > >> >>> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 10:17 AM
>>> > >> >>> To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> That is my understanding as well.
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> --
>>> > >> >>> Josh Tynjala
>>> > >> >>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 10:01 AM Alex Harui
>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>> > >
>>> > >> >>> wrote:
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> > IIRC, royale-config.xml does not include the MXRoyale swc but
>>> > >> >>> > flex-config.xml does.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > HTH,
>>> > >> >>> > -Alex
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > On 5/7/21, 9:30 AM, "Brian Raymes" <brian.ray...@teotech.com
>>> >
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     Okay, that worked. Thank you!
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     Was this changed somewhat recently? I haven't needed this
>>> > >> >>> > js-library-path before.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> >     From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > >> >>> >     Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 9:20 AM
>>> > >> >>> >     To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     I think that you need to manually add MXRoyaleJS.swc (and
>>> > >> >>> > MXRoyale.swc if you are targeting SWF too) to your compiler
>>> > options
>>> > >> in
>>> > >> >>> > asconfig.json, just like in this example:
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
>>> > >> >>> > ub.com
>>> > >> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fexamples%2Fmxroyale%2
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> FRemoteObjectAMFTest%2Fasconfig.json&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> .com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4w
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> LjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdat
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> a=7n3lX8iIPiag7%2BsSVRno9J1EANwNNwbabv4352E8izw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     The MX classes are not included automatically in the
>>> default
>>> > >> >>> "royale"
>>> > >> >>> >     config, and you need to opt into using them.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     --
>>> > >> >>> >     Josh Tynjala
>>> > >> >>> >     Bowler Hat LLC <
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
>>> > >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>> > >> %7C35efef06af8648019
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
>>> > >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> > >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:05 AM Brian Raymes <
>>> > >> >>> brian.ray...@teotech.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >     > Here is my asconfig.json file. Perhaps I'm missing how
>>> this
>>> > is
>>> > >> >>> used.
>>> > >> >>> > I
>>> > >> >>> >     > don't use this to compile, but it's necessary for source
>>> > >> >>> completion,
>>> > >> >>> >     > etc. I would imagine this can even be smaller in the
>>> cases
>>> > >> where
>>> > >> >>> > Maven is used?
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     > {
>>> > >> >>> >     >     "config": "royale",
>>> > >> >>> >     >     "type": "app",
>>> > >> >>> >     >     "compilerOptions": {
>>> > >> >>> >     >         "debug": true,
>>> > >> >>> >     >         "targets": [
>>> > >> >>> >     >             "JSRoyale"
>>> > >> >>> >     >         ],
>>> > >> >>> >     >         "source-map": true,
>>> > >> >>> >     >         "source-path": [
>>> > >> >>> >     >             "src/main/royale"
>>> > >> >>> >     >         ]
>>> > >> >>> >     >     },
>>> > >> >>> >     >     "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars
>>> > >> >>> >     > -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions
>>> > >> >>> >     > -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true
>>> > >> >>> -js-default-initializers=true
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> -keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,PostConstruct,PreDe
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> -keep-as3-metadata+stroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient
>>> > >> >>> >     > -keep-code-with-metadata=Inject",
>>> > >> >>> >     >     "files": [
>>> > >> >>> >     >         "src/main/royale/App.mxml"
>>> > >> >>> >     >     ],
>>> > >> >>> >     >     "mainClass": "App"
>>> > >> >>> >     > }
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> >     > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > >> >>> >     > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 8:44 AM
>>> > >> >>> >     > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     > What does your asconfig.json file look like?
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     > --
>>> > >> >>> >     > Josh Tynjala
>>> > >> >>> >     > Bowler Hat LLC <
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
>>> > >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>> > >> %7C35efef06af8648019
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
>>> > >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> > >
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes <
>>> > >> >>> > brian.ray...@teotech.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > I can compile just fine with Maven, , and have never
>>> > needed
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> >>> do
>>> > >> >>> >     > > anything like that in the past. It's VSCode that is
>>> > >> >>> > complaining that
>>> > >> >>> >     > > these imports do not exist.
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > Assuming the new royale-sdk I built is missing
>>> something?
>>> > >> Or my
>>> > >> >>> >     > > asconfig may need to be adjusted for the new sdk
>>> changes?
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > I followed what Josh explained below, removed
>>> > >> >>> >     > > "-DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path)
>>> option"
>>> > >> and
>>> > >> >>> >     > > replaced my previously built royale-sdk with the one
>>> from
>>> > a
>>> > >> >>> > fresh
>>> > >> >>> > build:
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > royale-asjs\distribution\target\apache-royale-0.9.9-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > Simply unzipped the above and replace my previous.
>>> After
>>> > >> doing
>>> > >> >>> so,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > all mx imports are reporting as missing (squiggly
>>> > >> underlines).
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> >     > > From: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:59 PM
>>> > >> >>> >     > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > I wonder if you mean the automatic imports....
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > with maven I often have something like this:
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > -compiler.mxml.imports=
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             mx.resources.ResourceManager,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.events.Event,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.events.EventDispatcher,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.events.IEventDispatcher,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             mx.events.MouseEvent,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             mx.events.FocusEvent,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             mx.events.KeyboardEvent,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.geom.*,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.core.ClassFactory,
>>> > >> >>> >     > >             org.apache.royale.core.IFactory;
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > In the <additionalCompilerOptions> nested section of
>>> the
>>> > >> royale
>>> > >> >>> >     > > compiler <configuration> tag
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > Is it more that, do you think, or more that you are
>>> > actually
>>> > >> >>> > missing
>>> > >> >>> >     > > the MXRoyale dependency?
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:49 PM Brian Raymes
>>> > >> >>> >     > > <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > I should have mentioned, I use Maven to compile.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > From: Brian Raymes <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:32 PM
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Hi Josh,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > I've done what you've said, and I can now build
>>> > >> successfully,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > thank
>>> > >> >>> >     > you.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > But.. Now, all MX imports cannot be found in my
>>> > project. I
>>> > >> >>> rely
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > heavily on AMF with my current project, and now my
>>> > project
>>> > >> >>> > within
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > VSCode is showing hundreds of errors, but can
>>> compile
>>> > >> >>> > successfully.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > What could I be missing? I compared the previously
>>> built
>>> > >> SDK
>>> > >> >>> > with
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > the new, and they are definitely structured
>>> differently.
>>> > >> The
>>> > >> >>> MX
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > SWCs are found within the new.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Thoughts?
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Brian
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 9:11 AM
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > To: Apache Royale Development <
>>> dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Unfortunately, Adobe no longer provides AIR SDK
>>> 20.0.
>>> > The
>>> > >> >>> only
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > version they still offer is AIR 32.0. On macOS, I
>>> > believe
>>> > >> >>> > AIR
>>> > >> >>> > 32.0
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > is also only downloadable in a .dmg format that the
>>> > Maven
>>> > >> >>> plugin
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > doesn't know how to process, which makes things even
>>> > >> harder.
>>> > >> >>> > Older
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > versions of the macOS AIR SDK used to be available
>>> in a
>>> > >> >>> > different
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > format, like .tbz2 or .tar.gz or something like
>>> that,
>>> > but
>>> > >> >>> Adobe
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > changed to .dmg only at some point. Anyway, this is
>>> why
>>> > >> >>> building
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > the
>>> > >> >>> >     > distribution is failing.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Those who can still build are lucky enough to have
>>> it in
>>> > >> >>> their
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > cache from before Adobe removed all of the files
>>> from
>>> > the
>>> > >> >>> > servers.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > But, there's hope! If you build the distribution
>>> without
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > specifying a target folder, it won't try to include
>>> > Adobe
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > artifacts. It's only when you build to a folder
>>> that the
>>> > >> AIR
>>> > >> >>> SDK
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > is used in the build
>>> > >> >>> >     > process.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > When you don't specify a target folder, the
>>> distribution
>>> > >> >>> will go
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > into a zip or tar.gz file instead. When the build
>>> > >> completes,
>>> > >> >>> you
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > can just extract that into a folder, and it's
>>> basically
>>> > >> the
>>> > >> >>> > same thing.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > If you need playerglobal.swc and the AIR SDK, you
>>> can
>>> > >> merge
>>> > >> >>> them
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > manually (like we used to do with the Adobe Flex SDK
>>> > >> before
>>> > >> >>> the
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Apache
>>> > >> >>> >     > installer).
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Basically, in your distribution build command, just
>>> > remove
>>> > >> >>> the
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > -DdistributionTargetFolder= (including the path)
>>> option,
>>> > >> and
>>> > >> >>> it
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > should work without the AIR SDK. I don't know
>>> whether
>>> > >> there
>>> > >> >>> are
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > other issues on the develop branch that might also
>>> cause
>>> > >> the
>>> > >> >>> > Maven
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > distribution build to fail, but this is how you deal
>>> > with
>>> > >> >>> > the AIR
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > SDK
>>> > >> >>> >     > part at least.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Josh Tynjala
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > Bowler Hat LLC <
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
>>> > >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>> > >> %7C35efef06af8648019
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
>>> > >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 6:17 PM Brian Raymes
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > <brian.ray...@teotech.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > +1 for fixing current state of repo.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > I haven't been able to successfully build with
>>> Maven
>>> > for
>>> > >> >>> > quite a
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > long while now due to what looks to be shifts with
>>> > this
>>> > >> >>> > release.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > For one, it seems to repeat ask to install the AIR
>>> > SDK,
>>> > >> but
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > fails to notify something, then fails to download
>>> as
>>> > >> they
>>> > >> >>> > can't be found.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > This happens about 20 times.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Example:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > [INFO]  - Installing Adobe AIR SDK 20.0 Your
>>> > System-Id:
>>> > >> >>> > ...........
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the
>>> Adobe
>>> > AIR
>>> > >> >>> SDK.
>>> > >> >>> > Do
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > you want to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR
>>> SDK
>>> > >> >>> License:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server
>>> build,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > alternatively to typing y or yes you can also set
>>> a
>>> > >> system
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > property containing your system which is
>>> interpreted
>>> > as
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > equivalent to accepting by typing y or
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > yes:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=...........
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > )
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Yes
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > [WARNING] Failed to notify spy
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> org.apache.flex.utilities.converter.mavenextension.FlexEventSpy:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Caught exception while downloading and converting
>>> > >> artifact.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > [INFO] Couldn't find artifact:
>>> > >> >>> com.adobe.air:20.0:runtime:pom
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > [INFO]
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> ===========================================================
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Then, it fails to build the distribution because
>>> of a
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > potentially all of these unresolved artifacts for
>>> > >> >>> > 0.9.9-SNAPSHOT.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:33 AM
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <
>>> dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Hi Yishay,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Where are you with release now ? Build is failing
>>> on
>>> > >> Maven
>>> > >> >>> > sight
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > for several days, cause it was switched to 0.9.9.
>>> Are
>>> > >> you
>>> > >> >>> > going
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > to make another attempt this week ?
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Thanks,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Piotr
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > niedz., 21 mar 2021 o 11:00 Harbs <
>>> > >> harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > napisał(a):
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > I think what I started was reverted.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > Thanks for picking up the slack for me…
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > Let me know if you need help from me.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > Harbs
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > On Mar 21, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Yishay Weiss
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Hi,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > I'd like to start a release again, maybe Harbs
>>> > will
>>> > >> >>> pick
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > this up later
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > when he's less loaded, so if anyone wants to
>>> update
>>> > >> the
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > release notes this might be a good time.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > I'd like to start afresh, so Harbs, let me
>>> know if
>>> > >> >>> > there are
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > RCs for
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > Royale or for compiler-build-tools that need
>>> > >> cancelling.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Thanks
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > ________________________________
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 3:51 PM
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <
>>> > >> dev@royale.apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Subject: Re: about releasing 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Hi! just finished my list of updates for 0.9.8
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Others are welcome to add to it for upcoming
>>> > >> release!
>>> > >> >>> :)
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > El mar., 17 nov. 2020 a las 20:07, Josh
>>> Tynjala (<
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>)
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > escribió:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> I just updated the RELEASE_NOTES.md files in
>>> both
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> royale-compiler and royale-asjs with my
>>> changes
>>> > for
>>> > >> >>> the
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> 0.9.8 release. Everyone should also
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > add
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> their own changes to these files.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> Josh Tynjala
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> Bowler Hat LLC <
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowl
>>> > >> >>> > erhat.dev%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>> > >> %7C35efef06af8648019
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 2d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> 057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >>
>>> LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=DiLQulH8C2HA9AzUp1h4I7
>>> > >> >>> > 0sWF5zKtEUyWRZ6VUplcg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:25 AM Carlos Rovira
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Thanks Harbs!
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> @Andrew I think we should all try to add to
>>> the
>>> > >> list
>>> > >> >>> of
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> new features,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> fixes
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> and more. If you could prepare different
>>> place
>>> > >> >>> > holders for
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> compiler-typedefs-asjs, we can all try to
>>> fill
>>> > it
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> thanks
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> El lun., 16 nov. 2020 a las 19:47, Andrew
>>> > Wetmore
>>> > >> (<
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > cottag...@gmail.com
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> )
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> escribió:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> Is there a list of new features and fixes
>>> since
>>> > >> >>> 0.9.7?
>>> > >> >>> > I
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> would like to
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> see
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> if i can at least get good documentation in
>>> > place
>>> > >> >>> about
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> those
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > changes.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> a
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:23 PM Harbs
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> OK. I’ll start tomorrow.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> (fingers crossed)
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> On Nov 16, 2020, at 5:55 PM, Carlos
>>> Rovira <
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Hi,
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> I think the time zone problems Chris
>>> warned
>>> > are
>>> > >> >>> now
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> behind us, and
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> want
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> to
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> open this thread about releasing 0.9.8.
>>> Many
>>> > >> >>> months
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> have passed
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >> and I
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> think
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> we need to push a new release soon, I
>>> think
>>> > >> >>> > before the
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> end of the
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> year
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>> will
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> be the best for us if possible.
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> What do you think? Harbs can we count on
>>> you
>>> > to
>>> > >> >>> > do the task?
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache
>>> > >> Software
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>> Foundation*
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=Jv7ToVc%2FryLL1epbcgxgIBfb0mvGu%2BWnGT4vmaxTMck%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>> Andrew Wetmore
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057283451%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wh%2FMsvDEhp2%2FxWCpfBXaJIDEIdKNTb9RuY3Btn3i8Lg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Carlos Rovira
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache
>>> > Software
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>> Foundation*
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057293410%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wGrBNB7Ul%2BEV%2FJiHqIrZW21drinZdmJJFhAej15LQks%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >>
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache
>>> Software
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > > > Foundation*
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C35efef06af86480192d708d911755db6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637560018057293410%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=wGrBNB7Ul%2BEV%2FJiHqIrZW21drinZdmJJFhAej15LQks%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > --
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > >> >>> >     > > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > > >
>>> > >> >>> >     > >
>>> > >> >>> >     >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> --
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> --
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>

Reply via email to