Without looking at the code, if the generic implementation is complicated it sounds like we should export that functionality to a DataGridColumnVisibilityBead. That way we can default to the simple case and override it easily (which is what you needed to do IIUC).
From: Hugo Ferreira<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 12:22 AM To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: DataGridColumn visible property seems to be ignored In this case seems a TODO implementation of the visible property. Controlling the visibility of the columns in a generic way seems too complex. Yishay Weiss <yish...@apache.org> escreveu no dia terça, 16/11/2021 à(s) 05:38: > This looks like a mistake in the SDK code unless I'm missing something, > Can anyone think of a reason to ignore true values? > > On 2021/11/15 00:19:26 Hugo Ferreira wrote: > > In fact, seems that was not implemented (from DataGridColumn.as): > > > > public function set visible(value:Boolean):void{ > > if (value != _visible) { > > _visible = value; > > //somehow, invalidate layout > > } > > } > > > > Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, > 15/11/2021 > > à(s) 00:13: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a DataGrid with several columns and I need to hide a few of them > > > depend of the business logic. > > > It seems that the visible property (that exists) in the DataGridColumn > is > > > ignored, even with the direct "false" value. > > > > > > Do I missing something or it's a property that exists but it's not > > > implemented the action? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Hugo. > > > > > >
