Yes, makes sense and it's more the way of Royale. For what I saw, we need to first support beads on DataGridColumn and then implement that bead. I will check that possibility later and if I can implement it that way, I can commit.
Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> escreveu no dia quarta, 17/11/2021 à(s) 08:26: > Without looking at the code, if the generic implementation is complicated > it sounds like we should export that functionality to a > DataGridColumnVisibilityBead. That way we can default to the simple case > and override it easily (which is what you needed to do IIUC). > > From: Hugo Ferreira<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 12:22 AM > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > Subject: Re: DataGridColumn visible property seems to be ignored > > In this case seems a TODO implementation of the visible property. > Controlling the visibility of the columns in a generic way seems too > complex. > > Yishay Weiss <yish...@apache.org> escreveu no dia terça, 16/11/2021 à(s) > 05:38: > > > This looks like a mistake in the SDK code unless I'm missing something, > > Can anyone think of a reason to ignore true values? > > > > On 2021/11/15 00:19:26 Hugo Ferreira wrote: > > > In fact, seems that was not implemented (from DataGridColumn.as): > > > > > > public function set visible(value:Boolean):void{ > > > if (value != _visible) { > > > _visible = value; > > > //somehow, invalidate layout > > > } > > > } > > > > > > Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, > > 15/11/2021 > > > à(s) 00:13: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have a DataGrid with several columns and I need to hide a few of > them > > > > depend of the business logic. > > > > It seems that the visible property (that exists) in the > DataGridColumn > > is > > > > ignored, even with the direct "false" value. > > > > > > > > Do I missing something or it's a property that exists but it's not > > > > implemented the action? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Hugo. > > > > > > > > > > >
