FWIW, way back, I wanted to hold off on a 1.0 until some Royale apps were
actually in production. I think this is now the case, so what else keeps us
from a 1.0 version?
-Alex
On 12/7/21, 10:05 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote:
Or even 0.10.0, 0.11.0, etc. would be fine too. No part of the
major.minor.revision version code is strictly constrained to 0-9 only.
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cca220d20dc9a4198260108d9b9ac0b3e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637744971437180957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=7omox%2FoGgSIqZVuYtDTxjPs%2BXzFBO%2FRg%2FsMLjRQw8J4%3D&reserved=0>
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 9:16 AM Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds good to me. I assume there is no reason that we cannot have 0.9.10,
> 0.9.11 if we need to before 1.0, but I don't know about the 'automatic'
> setting to 1.0.
>
> I'd also suggest that it might be easier to wait until January, because a
> number of us will be affected in the coming weeks with holidays etc.
>
> At some point I will volunteer for the release process, but I do need to
be
> focused on the compiler and framework for the next couple of
> months, instead of learning new things. I'll do what I can to support
> anyone working on the release, though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:48 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I think there is enough to start a new release. Are there any
volunteers?
> > If we release 0.9.9 the next version will automatically (I think be set)
> to
> > 1.0.
> >
> > Are we ready for that?
> >
> > Appreciate your thoughts.
> >
> >
>
