We changed over 613 java files, why only 49 emails?! :) That's not including *.xml and others. (just need to set the record straight so folks don't get the impression that Rya is tiny.) david.
-----Original Message----- From: Aaron D. Mihalik [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 12:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: commits@rya list? I concur. commits@rya and notifications@rya. How do we do this? Also, how do we ping infrastructure to let them know that it hasn't been pushed to github? As for the 49 emails: yeah, we saw that on the initial commit from Puja, too. RYA-7 updated all of the License headers, so we essentially changed every file in the repo :( --Aaron On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:44 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Wowza. RYA-7 resulted in 49 emails!? One email per diff. Is this > something configurable? I don't recall ever seeing that before on > other projects. > > But, on topic... I'm a fan of Sean's recommendation for a mailing list > dedicated to general "non-human-generated" messages (commits, CI, etc). > > Sean Busbey wrote: > > When the Apache Yetus PMC was setting up resources we were going to > > skip a dedicated commits list and a few folks spoke up about teh > > utility of a dedicated commits alias. I personally don't mind having > > things mixed up, but mailing lists are cheap so I generally > > recommend taking on things that folks find useful. > > > > If you're going to make an additional mailing list to handle > > non-commit automated emails, I'd recommend making it something like > > "notifications@rya" instead of "issues@rya" so that when e.g. y'all > > add automated CI builds those same emails can go there. > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Adina Crainiceanu<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I agree, commits should go to commits not dev. The mailing list is > >> configured such that replies go to dev list, which I think is > appropriate. > >> > >> > >> I saw that some projects send the issue tracking changes to > >> commits, > rather > >> than creating a new mailing list for issues@. For now, should we > >> just configure the issue tracker to send the automated messages to > >> commits, > and > >> then create an issues message list later, or would people prefer an > issues > >> list right now? > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Puja Valiyil<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Commits go to commits. Aaron had also wanted to set up an issues > >>> list where things related to jira and automated build related > >>> email traffic would go. > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Sean Busbey<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Heya folks, > >>>> > >>>> We have a commits@rya list, but right now all the commit > notifications > >>>> go to dev@rya. > >>>> > >>>> Would folks prefer that we keep everything going to dev, or > >>>> change things so that commits go to commits? > >>>> > >>>> -Sean > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Adina Crainiceanu > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.usna.edu_Us > >> ers_cs_adina_&d=BQIBaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq1 > >> 0&r=ruy1rriFBFoeOJvvQWwN1h8AcdSNT3EVLrdVl7pr-iA&m=MiIX-sol0c8sEa1au > >> cGFODUVupPjMmxfpO_z9tM9hxw&s=O0TKcm9wiJAaRAhKkZMWrxaMkTy2IQX1e2Czij > >> Wudu8&e= >
