Puja Valiyil wrote:
Aaron and Caleb talked about the status of the release.  They described the
remaining steps and outlined what they are planning to do this week to for
creating the release.  Aaron had a question about gpg maven tools.

Were these left outstanding? I have a little bit of experience here.

We spent some time talking through Jira and how as a community we need to
document and conform to standard definitions about jira states.  We decided
to increase community involvement by:
1.  Establishing WIP pull requests: If a developer has started work, they
should not wait until the work has finished to submit the pull request.
Instead they can submit WIP pull requests and receive feedback as they
develop the feature.
2.  Moving more design discussions to confluence and the dev list:  Rather
than having discussions over email (which may happen outside of the dev
list), we should move more discussions related to design to confluence,
jira, and the dev list

Err, hold up. Discussions *must* happen on email. Are discussions happening outside of the dev list now? The in-person meetings are OK to talk about ideas, but just reporting minutes and decisions agreed upon by the IRL attendees is not OK.

IMO, email is still the best way to have interactive discussion, but recording design decisions and architectures on Confluence as reference material sounds like a good idea to me.

We also decided to make the Rya working group alternate between
prioritizing bugs in jira and community outreach.

The next working group will be in two weeks and will focus on prioritizing
tasks in jira and putting together a road map for the project.  The working
group after that will discuss how to add a new backend persistence to Rya.

Thanks,
Puja

Reply via email to