I have a pull request that fixes that problem.. it has been stuck in limbo
for months.. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rya-site/pull/1  Can
someone merge it into master?

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Liu, Eric <[email protected]> wrote:

> Cool, thanks for the help.
> By the way, the link to the Rya Manual is outdated on the rya.apache.org
> site. Should be pointing at https://github.com/apache/
> incubator-rya/blob/master/extras/rya.manual/src/site/markdown/_index.md
>
> On 2/23/17, 12:34 PM, "Aaron D. Mihalik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     deep vs wide:
>
>     A property path query is probably your best bet.  Something like:
>
>     for the following data:
>
>     s:EventA p:causes s:EventB
>     s:EventB p:causes s:EventC
>     s:EventC p:causes s:EventD
>
>
>     This query would start at EventB and work it's way up and down the
> chain:
>
>     SELECT * WHERE {
>        <s:EventB> (<p:causes>|^<p:causes>)* ?s . ?s ?p ?o
>     }
>
>
>     On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:58 PM Meier, Caleb <[email protected]>
>     wrote:
>
>     > Yes, that's a good place to start.  If you have external timestamps
> that
>     > are built into your graph using the time ontology in owl (e.g you
> have
>     > triples of the form (event123, time:inDateTime, 2017-02-23T14:29)),
> the
>     > temporal index is exactly what you want.  If you are hoping to query
> based
>     > on the internal timestamps that Accumulo assigns to your triples,
> then
>     > there are some slight tweaks that can be done to facilitate this,
> but it
>     > won't be nearly as efficient (this will require some sort of client
> side
>     > filtering).
>     >
>     > Caleb A. Meier, Ph.D.
>     > Software Engineer II ♦ Analyst
>     > Parsons Corporation
>     > 1911 N. Fort Myer Drive, Suite 800 ♦ Arlington, VA 22209
>     > Office:  (703)797-3066 <(703)%20797-3066>
>     > [email protected] ♦ www.parsons.com
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Liu, Eric [mailto:[email protected]]
>     > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 2:27 PM
>     > To: [email protected]
>     > Subject: Re: Timestamps and Cardinality in Queries
>     >
>     > We’d like to be able to query by timestamp; specifically, we want to
> be
>     > able to find all statements that were made within a given time
> range. Is
>     > this what I should be looking at?
>     > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.
> apache.org_confluence_download_attachments_63407907_
> Rya-2520Temporal-2520Indexing.pdf-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-
> 3D1464789502000-26api-3Dv2&d=CwIGaQ&c=Nwf-pp4xtYRe0sCRVM8_
> LWH54joYF7EKmrYIdfxIq10&r=vuVdzYC2kksVZR5STiFwDpzJ7CrMHCgeo_4WXTD0qo8&m=
> BBheKpKX7A1Ijs8q_TDEUVtdfu-r015XHZjmcw6veAw&s=vLayAkLG0IKGE-
> 0NbwRQKfpcfId05fXE5TX8oMJaa7Q&e=
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > On 2/22/17, 6:21 PM, "Meier, Caleb" <[email protected]> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Hey Eric,
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Currently timestamps can't be queried in Rya.  Do you need to be
> able
>     > to query by timestamp, or simply discover the timestamp for a given
> node?
>     > Rya does have a temporal index, but that requires you to use a
> temporal
>     > ontology to model the temporal properties of your graph nodes.
>     >
>     >     ________________________________________
>     >
>     >     From: Liu, Eric <[email protected]>
>     >
>     >     Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 6:38 PM
>     >
>     >     To: [email protected]
>     >
>     >     Subject: Timestamps and Cardinality in Queries
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Hi,
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Continuing from our talk earlier today I was wondering if you
> could
>     > provide more information about how timestamps could be queried in
> Rya.
>     >
>     >     Also, we are trying to support a type of query that would
> essentially
>     > be limiting on cardinality (different from the normal SPARQL limit
> because
>     > it’s for node cardinality rather than total results). I saw in one of
>     > Caleb’s talks that Rya’s query optimization involves checking
> cardinality
>     > first. I was wondering if there would be some way to tap into this
> feature
>     > for usage in queries?
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >
>     >     Eric Liu
>     >
>     >     ________________________________________________________
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>     > proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
>     > solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
> information
>     > transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or
> entity
>     > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended
>     > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
>     > dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of
> any
>     > action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If
> you
>     > have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> and
>     > delete the material from your computer.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ________________________________________________________
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
>     > proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
>     > solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The
> information
>     > transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or
> entity
>     > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended
>     > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
>     > dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of
> any
>     > action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If
> you
>     > have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> and
>     > delete the material from your computer.
>     >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
>

Reply via email to