+1 (non-binding)
I tested that `sbt test`` and `sbt package`` work well in the following
environment.

# TEST ENV

## O/S
```
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="16.04.2 LTS (Xenial Xerus)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS"
VERSION_ID="16.04"
HOME_URL="http://www.ubuntu.com/";
SUPPORT_URL="http://help.ubuntu.com/";
BUG_REPORT_URL="http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/";
VERSION_CODENAME=xenial
UBUNTU_CODENAME=xenial
```

## java
```
openjdk version "1.8.0_131"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_131-8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.3-b11)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.131-b11, mixed mode)
```

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:35 PM Hwansung Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I tried RC2 on Mac OS 10.12.5 , SBT 0.13.9, SCALA 2.12.1, Java(TM) SE
> Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13).
>
> I tested the same as others tested.
> All tests passed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Hwansung
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Min-Seok Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > The followings are tried on macOS Sierra, SBT 0.13.9, SCALA 2.11.7,
> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13).
> >
> > 1. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> > 2. Release consists of source code only, no binaries(find . -type f -exec
> > file {} \; | grep -v text)
> > 3. DISCLAIMER is correct, filenames include "incubating", top level
> NOTICE
> > and LICENSE files.
> > 4. Check license header on files by following DEVELOPMENT.md.
> > 5. `sbt package` then, run `bin/example.sh` on
> > `target/apache-s2graph-0.2.0-incubating-bin/` is passed.
> > 6. `sbt compile test:compile` to see any compile errors.
> > 7. `sbt "project loader" assembly`, `sbt "project s2counter_loader"`
> > assembly to see executable jar successfully built from source.
> > 8. `sbt test` to see if all test cases passed.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Minseok
> >
> > 2017-08-07 17:13 GMT+09:00 DO YUNG YOON <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > I tried RC2 on ubuntu 16.04, SBT 0.13.9, SCALA 2.11.7, OpenJDK
> 1.8.0_91.
> > >
> > > Checked followings.
> > >
> > > 1. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
> > > 2. Release consists of source code only, no binaries
> > > 3. DISCLAIMER is correct, filenames include "incubating", top level
> > NOTICE
> > > and LICENSE files.
> > > 4. Check license header on files by following DEVELOPMENT.md.
> > > 5. Test if I can run `bin/example.sh` after build using `sbt package`.
> > > 6. `sbt compile`, `sbt test:compile` to see any compile errors.
> > > 7. `sbt "project loader" assembly`, `sbt "project s2counter_loader"`
> > > assembly to see executable jar successfully built from source.
> > > 8. `sbt test` to see if all test cases passed.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:10 PM DO YUNG YOON <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache S2Graph 0.2.0-incubating,
> release
> > > > candidate 2.
> > > >
> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> > at:
> > > >
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/0.
> > > 2.0-incubating-RC2
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.2.0-incubating-rc2:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.2.0-incubating-rc2
> > > >
> > > > The release hash is 917475b62d68ac952716df5d8ce6465656ec1f25:
> > > >
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s2graph.
> > > git;a=commit;h=917475b62d68ac952716df5d8ce6465656ec1f25
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/s2graph/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Once download source, please look into README.md to build from
> source.
> > > >
> > > > Notable changes from 0.1.0 is providing tinkerpop3
> > > integration(S2GRAPH-72,
> > > > S2GRAPH-151).
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will
> > try
> > > > to close it Wednesday August 9 if we have sufficient votes.
> > > >
> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> items
> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> > > > please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > DOYUNG YOON.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to