Sorry, hit the send button too fast. Let me correct the summary section: 29/32 tickets Status=open/reopen : https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SAMZA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.10.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
Three tickets excluded: - SAMZA-689, @Chinmay, were you able to re-produce it? I am thinking of mark it as won't fix since 0.10.0 will remove the checkpoint topic altogether. - SAMZA-747, we will have to upgrade to RocksDB 3.11.1 to include the fix that breaks Samza 0.10.0 build on Linux boxes - SAMZA-723, stream appender deadlock issue Thanks! -Yi On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, all, > > Thanks a lot for helping out to select the features planned in 0.10.0. > > Based on the above discussion, I am proposing to move the following > tickets later (i.e. 0.11.0). > > 30/32 tickets Status=open/reopen (exception for SAMZA-723: stream appender > deadlock issue) : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SAMZA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.10.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > Two tickets excluded: > - SAMZA-689, @Chinmay, were you able to re-produce it? I am thinking of > mark it as won't fix since 0.10.0 will remove the checkpoint topic > altogether. > - SAMZA-747, we will have to upgrade to RocksDB 3.11.1 to include the fix > that breaks Samza 0.10.0 build on Linux boxes > > Anything that I missed? > > Thanks! > > -Yi > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Navina Ramesh < > nram...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > >> +1 for StreamAppender bug fix as a mandatory in 0.10. >> >> @Yan: will review SAMZA-676 today and test it out locally. >> >> Thanks! >> Navina >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Chinmay Soman <chinmay.cere...@gmail.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> > I can take care of SAMZA-340, SAMZA-683 and will follow up with Luis >> for >> > SAMZA-401,2,3,4 >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Dan <danharve...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > I agree SAMZA-741 for the ElasticSearch producer should be in too so >> > we've >> > > got a better API as part of that release. >> > > >> > > - Dan >> > > >> > > >> > > On 29 July 2015 at 07:51, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Actually, I also want to include a few patch-available features, >> > > > especially: >> > > > >> > > > 1. broadcast stream (SAMZA-676) >> > > > - waiting for review >> > > > >> > > > 2. graphite support (SAMZA-340) >> > > > 3. meter and histogram (SAMZA-683) >> > > > 4. utility (SAMZA-401) >> > > > - 2,3,4 belong to Luis, if he does not have time to update, >> since >> > > they >> > > > only need some small changes, we can edit it and get +1 from another >> > > > committer. >> > > > >> > > > 5. hdfs producer (SAMZA-693) >> > > > - I am reviewing. >> > > > >> > > > 6. upgrade yarn to 2.7.1 (SAMZA-563) >> > > > - though I am reviewing, this ticket is negotiable if we want to >> put >> > > > into the 0.10.0 release. If we do not, I think, when users enable >> the >> > > > worker-persisting and container-persisting features, Samza will not >> be >> > > able >> > > > to handle it. (Some classes are only available after yarn 2.5.0 >> while >> > > Samza >> > > > currently only support yarn 2.4.0) >> > > > >> > > > 7. others: scrooge, class loader isolation, etc. >> > > > - those are waiting for reviewing too. >> > > > >> > > > My opinion is that, if we can clean up all the patch-available >> tickets, >> > > it >> > > > will be great. Most of them have been already reviewed more than >> once. >> > > So I >> > > > think it should not be very time-consuming to have them in the >> 0.10.0 >> > > > release. >> > > > >> > > > What do you think? >> > > > >> > > > Of course, another must-have is the bug-fix of the Stream Appender. >> :) >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > >> > > > Fang, Yan >> > > > yanfang...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Roger Hoover < >> roger.hoo...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Thanks, Yi. >> > > > > >> > > > > I propose that we also include SAMZA-741 for Elasticsearch >> versioning >> > > > > support with the new ES producer. I think it's very close to >> being >> > > > merged. >> > > > > >> > > > > Roger >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi, all, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I want to start the discussion on the release schedule for >> 0.10.0. >> > > > There >> > > > > > are a few important features that we plan to release in 0.10.0 >> and >> > I >> > > > want >> > > > > > to start this thread s.t. we can agree on what to include in >> 0.10.0 >> > > > > > release. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > There are the following main features added in 0.10.0: >> > > > > > - RocksDB TTL support >> > > > > > - Add CoordinatorStream and disable CheckpointManager >> > > > > > - Elasticsearch Producer >> > > > > > - Host affinity >> > > > > > And other 0.10.0 tickets: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SAMZA%20AND%20status%20in%20(%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.10.0 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I propose to cut a 0.10.0 release after we get the following >> issues >> > > > > > resolved: >> > > > > > - SAMZA-615: Migrate checkpoint from checkpoint topic to >> > Coordinator >> > > > > stream >> > > > > > - SAMZA-617: YARN host affinity in Samza >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thoughts? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -Yi >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks and regards >> > >> > Chinmay Soman >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Navina R. >> > >
