Thanks for the feedback folks. Since the feedback is positive, I'll start a
VOTE for the SEP.
@Jagadish Venkatraman <jagadish1...@gmail.com>, will add a link to this SEP
to the contributor's corner in the appropriate place.

Thanks,
Prateek

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:09 PM Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding). lgtm. Thanks!
>
> -Yi
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 8:08 AM Daniel Nishimura <dnishim...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. Thank Prateek for standardizing the PR process better.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:55 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian <
> > codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1.  Template looks good to me.
> > > It will be really helpful to sift through, categorize and prepare
> release
> > > notes from notable PRs during releases.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bharath
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 11:24 PM Jagadish Venkatraman <
> > > jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, thanks for the write-up Prateek.
> > > >
> > > > Let's also update the contributor's guidelines at:
> > > > https://samza.apache.org/contribute/contributors-corner.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, December 13, 2019, Prateek Maheshwari <
> prateek...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > In order to make Samza PR descriptions and commit messages more
> > > > consistent,
> > > > > informative and discoverable, we propose the following requirements
> > for
> > > > new
> > > > > PRs submitted to the Samza project
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SAMZA/SEP-25%3A+
> > > > > PR+Title+And+Description+Guidelines
> > > > >
> > > > > Contributors should copy-paste and update the description template
> > when
> > > > > submitting PRs.
> > > > > Committers should ensure that the guidelines are followed before
> > > merging
> > > > > changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please take a look and let us know if you have any concerns or
> > > > suggestions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Prateek
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jagadish
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to