On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:23 +0800, Xu Ming Wang wrote: > I think keep the member's name maybe better, we perhaps need them when > refresh source data. This problem may impact Field reference-- it uses > field item's name as base item now.
Yup. I think, ultimately, we need to switch to using numerical indexes for all field and field member references in ods file format instead of using their textural names. That would resolve issues with fields with identical names as well as the issue you just raised with field names with fractional numbers. I think the next step is to come up with a new XML structure that achieves this while maintaining a reasonable level of backward compatibility. Let's work on that before going any further with this. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida - OpenOffice.org Engineer - Novell, Inc. <kyosh...@novell.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@sc.openoffice.org
