Hi Regina, On Sunday, 2010-08-29 18:33:38 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> [... CheckMatrix ...] > > In case of simple regression (nCase==1) the values M and N are not > set correctly, but the initial value 0 is returned. In case of an > emtpy MatX the values for nCX and nRX are only set in case of > TREND/GROWTH. Currently this gives no error, because the loops do > not run over N, M, nCX, or nRX but over nCY and nRY and the value > for N is determined in that loops again. > > I struggle about this, because I want to use N and M in my solution > for LINEST, to test, whether there are enough observations at all. > > I want to change CheckMatrix, so that N, M, nCX, nRX are set > correctly in all cases. The parameter 'BOOL _bTrendGrowth' is then > no longer needed and can be removed (otherwise it will produce a > compiler warning). > > Do you agree with those changes? Yes, absolutely. I think the method as it is is a result of a refactoring, combining code of LINEST and LOGEST as it was back then. Eike -- OOo Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. Signature key 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Oracle: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS -- Please don't send mail to the old e...@sun.com account that I used for mailing lists, it phased out. Use eike.rat...@oracle.com instead. Thanks.
Description: PGP signature