Yes, you are right. As seen from existing cases, support for Flink 1.15 and 1.16 is already relatively stable. In this regard, I suggest focusing on continuous integration and testing to ensure that SeaTunnel remains compatible and performs optimally with the latest Flink versions. Additionally, it may be worth exploring any new features or improvements in Flink 1.17 and beyond that could further enhance SeaTunnel's capabilities and performance. Finally, it is important to gather feedback from users and the community to understand their needs and prioritize any necessary updates or bug fixes.
What do you think? or Do you have any good advice? Jia Fan <[email protected]> 于2023年3月30日周四 19:03写道： > > Before to do this we should make sure Flink 1.15 on SeaTunnel are stable > > ________________________ > > Jia Fan > > > > > 2023年3月30日 18:11，Lucifer Tyrant <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > Hi all, > > > > Recently, the Flink community has released the official version > > 1.17[1], which has greatly improved batch processing capabilities. > > Therefore, I propose to continue integrating SeaTunnel with the latest > > version and stop supporting Flink 1.13. What do you think about this? > > > > Best wishes! > > Chao Tian > > > > [1] > > https://flink.apache.org/2023/03/23/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.17/ >
