[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17687354#comment-17687354
]
Doug Dennis commented on SEDONA-241:
------------------------------------
[~jiayu] Something like this seems like it could break user code. Is there a
plan here to wait for a Sedona 2.0 to make it live by default? Maybe add a flag
for strict OGC compliance that implements 1-indexing, and issue warnings if it
isn't set?
> InteriorRingN should be 1 indexed not 0 indexed
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SEDONA-241
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-241
> Project: Apache Sedona
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jia Yu
> Priority: Major
>
> See PostGIS doc: [https://postgis.net/docs/ST_InteriorRingN.html]
>
> This might affect several other XXX_N functions as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
