[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17713948#comment-17713948
 ] 

Martin Andersson commented on SEDONA-276:
-----------------------------------------

[~kontinuation] It appears that Iceberg is maintaining completely separate 
implementations for various Spark versions. Do you believe we should follow a 
similar approach, or could we utilize an adapter class with different 
implementations for different Spark versions?

> Add support for Spark 3.4
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SEDONA-276
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-276
>             Project: Apache Sedona
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Martin Andersson
>            Priority: Major
>
> Spark 3.4.0 was announced on April 14. 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread/o1o9n1t036rmfp45q1jrjs0zzzx0j156]
> Findings from a quick test build using -Dspark.version=3.4.0:
>  # Incompatible logging api versions causes test failures.
>  # GeoParquet and Geotiff datasources fails to compile due to api changes in 
> Spark.
> Setting log4j and slf4j to the same versions as Spark 3.4.0 uses solves 1. I 
> don't know how that will affect other Spark versions.
> To solve 2 we might need to use reflection to handle the api changes in Spark.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to