> On March 2, 2017, 9:40 a.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/package.jdo
> > Lines 287 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57220/diff/2/?file=1652981#file1652981line287>
> >
> >     SENTRY-1638, need changes to sql script scripts for 5 different 
> > databases. What is the plan for that?
> 
> Lei Xu wrote:
>     I mis-understood the intention of this JIRA. This JIRA should be changing 
> the 5 sql scripts for `MSentryPathChange`. I will do that in a new patch.
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
>     I will add required sql changes needed for notification id. I have jira 
> SENTRY-1569 which handles the sql changes for  SENTRY_PERM_CHANGE and 
> SENTRY_PATH_CHANGE tables.

That'd be great. Thanks Kalyan!  I will close this JIRA then.

Btw, Hao mentioned that only MSentryPathChange should have notification ID.


- Lei


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57220/#review167691
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 1, 2017, 2:23 p.m., Lei Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57220/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 1, 2017, 2:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry and Hao Hao.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1638
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1638
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This work is similar to SENTRY-1448, that adds a notification ID field in 
> MSentryPermChange to be persistanted
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/MSentryPermChange.java
>  476fbcb2ad26de23757842111beb12b154e1562b 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/package.jdo
>  e981bcf0f327346c09cdbe5785fb8824fc62e704 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57220/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn clean package
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lei Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to