Sounds reasonable to me as long as they can get someone to do the commit in a 
reasonable timeframe.  I wouldn’t want to have to wait days for it to get in 
after it has been properly reviewed. 

> On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I would like to propose an adjustment to the commit process in Sentry
> project. The idea is to require that commit should not be done by the
> person providing the change but by some other committer. This committer's
> responsibility is to ensure that all code review concerns were addressed in
> one way or another and to do a final sanity check. This committer can be
> one of the reviewers or someone who didn't review the code.
> What do you think?
> - Alex

Reply via email to