How is this committer going to be assigned?
This might lead to some complications if the committer assigned leave for
vacations afterward and the community is not notified. It will end up
delaying the commits and the author (being a committer) won't be able to
commit the patch due to this process. What are we trying to solve with this?

Btw, I've seen in other projects that some committers usually wait 1 or 2
days to commit a patch after a +1 has been done on it. This is to allow
other reviewers to disagree with the +1 and give more feedback before
committing the patch. Would this help?

- Sergio

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Stephen Moist <> wrote:

> Sounds reasonable to me as long as they can get someone to do the commit
> in a reasonable timeframe.  I wouldn’t want to have to wait days for it to
> get in after it has been properly reviewed.
> > On Feb 22, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Alexander Kolbasov <>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I would like to propose an adjustment to the commit process in Sentry
> > project. The idea is to require that commit should not be done by the
> > person providing the change but by some other committer. This committer's
> > responsibility is to ensure that all code review concerns were addressed
> in
> > one way or another and to do a final sanity check. This committer can be
> > one of the reviewers or someone who didn't review the code.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > - Alex

Reply via email to