-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66787/#review201928
-----------------------------------------------------------




dev-support/smart-apply-patch.sh
Line 33 (original), 32 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66787/#comment283546>

    Will we not continue to support stdin patches? I think it can still be 
achieved with git.



dev-support/smart-apply-patch.sh
Line 44 (original)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66787/#comment283550>

    Do we not still want to detect this situation (only new files) and try 
applying the patch at levels 0,1,2? (Lines 44 - 85)


- Anthony Young-Garner


On April 24, 2018, 9:18 p.m., Steve Moist wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66787/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 24, 2018, 9:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry.
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removed using the patch command and instead am using "git apply" for diffs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   dev-support/smart-apply-patch.sh fce27354 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66787/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Used it to apply a patch, then tested with apply a patch with conflicts, 
> doing a dry-run.  Also tested with rename/moves.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Moist
> 
>

Reply via email to