> On June 27, 2018, 12:50 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> > sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/metastore/SentryHmsEvent.java
> > Lines 224-233 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/67749/diff/2/?file=2046227#file2046227line224>
> >
> >     As sentry doesn't changes to configurations at runtime, we doesn't have 
> > to do this every time.
> >     We can use constant that is initialized once and we can just use in 
> > setAuthorizable method.
> >     
> >     we need not pass the HiveAuthzConf while construncting SentryHmsEvent.
> 
> Na Li wrote:
>     I have changed to code to get server name at once and use it in following 
> calls. 
>     
>     For class encapsulation and future extention, it is still better to 
> provide HiveAuthzConf to SentryHmsEvent than for caller to get the 
> configuration and provide to it as input.
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
>     Lina, serverName need be not stored again in SentryHmsEvent. Why don't 
> you pass serverName to setAuthorizable in the constructor directly?
>     Example:
>      public SentryHmsEvent(String inServerName, CreateDatabaseEvent event) {
>         this(event, EventType.CREATE_DATABASE);
>         setOwnerInfo(event.getDatabase());
>         setAuthorizable(event.getDatabase(), inServerName);
>       }

I saved it, so I don't need to provide it as input for each setAuthorizable(). 
What is the significent advantage of not saving a variable versus the current 
approach?


- Na


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67749/#review205423
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 27, 2018, 7:13 p.m., Na Li wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67749/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 27, 2018, 7:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Arjun Mishra, kalyan kumar kalvagadda, and Sergio 
> Pena.
> 
> 
> Bugs: sentry-2280
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/sentry-2280
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The required fields in TSentryHmsEventNotification and 
> TSentryHmsEventNotificationResponse are not filled, which caused the request 
> from client to sever to be null. And the response from server to client is 
> null. Change the data structure to make owner info optional, and fill other 
> required fields properly
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/metastore/SentryHmsEvent.java
>  42be3c3 
>   
> sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/metastore/SentrySyncHMSNotificationsPostEventListener.java
>  f7d1b07 
>   
> sentry-binding/sentry-binding-hive/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/binding/metastore/TestSentrySyncHMSNotificationsPostEventListener.java
>  8e79cac 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-api/src/gen/thrift/gen-javabean/org/apache/sentry/api/service/thrift/TSentryHmsEventNotification.java
>  75b2799 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-api/src/main/resources/sentry_policy_service.thrift
>  56aedcb 
>   
> sentry-service/sentry-service-server/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/api/service/thrift/SentryPolicyStoreProcessor.java
>  3927150 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67749/diff/4/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually trace into code and verfied that now the server receives request and 
> client receiveds response correctly
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Na Li
> 
>

Reply via email to